The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city

The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Đề bài: The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city - mẫu 1

The bar chart illustrates the proportions of recycled domestic waste in the categories of plastic, cans, paper, and glass over a ten-year period, from 1992 to 2002.

Overall, there was an upward trend in the recycling rates for all four waste types, with the most notable change observed in the recycling of glass.

In the initial year, cans accounted for the highest proportion of recycled waste compared to the other three categories, constituting nearly 20% of the total. However, after a slight decline in the following five years, the recycling rate of cans experienced a significant surge, reaching close to 30% by the end of the period. By contrast, plastic had the lowest recycling rate in the starting year, merely 10%, and underwent a marginal increase of approximately 3% before stabilizing at this level in subsequent years.

It is worth noting that the other two waste categories experienced more substantial changes during the same period. Initially, only about 16% of glass waste was recycled and utilized. However, within the following five years, this figure doubled, and the recycling rate continued to grow steadily, eventually representing nearly half of the recycled waste in 2002. Similarly, the recycling rate of paper witnessed a consistent upward trajectory, rising from approximately 15% in 1994 to a considerable 38% in 2002.

The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city - mẫu 2

The chart depicts the recycling rates of various types of household waste in a city from 1992 to 2002.

Overall, glass consistently had the highest recycling rate, while all four types of waste exhibited a general upward trend in recycling percentages over the decade.

In 1992, the recycling rates for glass and paper were nearly identical, each at around 17%. However, significant increases were observed in the following years. By 2002, the proportion of recycled glass had surged to just under 47%, becoming the highest, whereas paper recycling also saw a notable rise to 37%, securing the second highest position.

Conversely, the recycling rate for cans initially declined from 17% to 14% between 1992 and 1997 but subsequently rebounded to 27% by 2002. Plastic, which was the least recycled material at 10% in 1992, experienced only minor fluctuations; it edged up to 13% in 1997 and then stabilized at that level for the rest of the period.

The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city - mẫu 3

The chart depicts the percentages of household waste materials recycled in a city over the years 1992, 1997, and 2002.

Overall, recycling rates for most materials showed an upward trend, with the exception of cans. Notably, glass and paper had higher recycling percentages compared to other materials throughout most of the period, except in 1992 when cans led the chart.

In 1992, cans were the most recycled material, with about 18% of them being processed. Glass and paper came next, with recycling rates of 15% and 14%, respectively. Plastic had the lowest recycling rate at just 10%.

Thereafter, the recycling rate for glass increased more than threefold, reaching nearly 50% in 2002, making it the most recycled material that year. Paper recycling followed a similar trend, also seeing a significant rise, reaching nearly 40% by 2002. Conversely, the percentage of cans being recycled dropped to 13% in 1997 but then slightly recovered to 15% in 2002. Plastic recycling improved modestly to 12% in 2002, yet it remained the least recycled material over the decade.

The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city - mẫu 4

The bar chart illustrates the proportion of household waste recycled in a particular city from 1992 to 2002, categorized into four main types: plastic, cans, glass, and paper.

Overall, there was a substantial upward trend in recycling rates across all materials over the decade, with glass recycling showing the most remarkable increase.

In 1992, recycling rates for plastic and cans were notably lower than those for glass and paper, standing at around 10% and 18% respectively. Plastic saw a modest rise to approximately 12% by 1997, whereas the recycling rate for cans halved to about 9% during the same period. By 2002, the recycling rate for plastic remained stagnant at 12%, while cans rebounded to nearly 20%.

In contrast, glass and paper started at approximately 15% and 14% respectively in 1992. Both materials experienced consistent growth, with paper recycling rate climbing to around 21% by 1997 and glass reaching approximately 29%. By the end of the period in 2002, glass and paper recycling rates soared to approximately 50% and 40% respectively, making them the most recycled materials in the city.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

• The chart below shows the changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

• The maps below show a town centre in 1990 and the same town centre today. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

• The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

• The charts below give information about the number of hours that students study each day at five different universities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

---