Research into new types of medicine and treatments are essential for improving health and dealing with diseases

Research into new types of medicine and treatments are essential for improving health and dealing with diseases. Who do you think should fund these researches: private companies, individuals or governments? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Đề bài: Research into new types of medicine and treatments are essential for improving health and dealing with diseases. Who do you think should fund these researches: private companies, individuals or governments?

Research into new types of medicine and treatments are essential for improving health and dealing with diseases - mẫu 1

It is necessary to conduct studies on new medicines and remedies in order to improve people’s health as well as cure their illnesses. In my opinion, such research should be financed by either the government or individuals, not private businesses.

If medical research is sponsored by private companies, patients would have to suffer from the increased price of medicines and treatments. In fact, such research requires the funders to cover various expenses, such as buying equipment or hiring staff. However, most companies often see money as one of their primary objectives, so they would have to make sure their revenues are high enough to prevent losses and stay profitable. Some profit-oriented companies may even make researchers set a higher price for their research outcomes to maximize their earnings. Consequently, medicine products as well as medical treatments would be more expensive for patients to afford, and those who are impoverished would be more likely to succumb to their disease.

It is the governing bodies and individuals who should financially support studies related to the improvement of public health and the invention of cures for diseases. First, maintaining people’s quality of life is one of the main responsibilities of the government in a country. In order to fulfill this duty, the government needs to ensure that more and more citizens will be healed, and their well-being can be enhanced by spending the national budget researching new medicines and medical treatments. Second, individuals should be another fund provider because medical research is carried out for the sake of their own health. As new types of medicines and new treatment practices are successfully devised, it is each individual in society that uses these medicines and treatments when they get sick.

In conclusion, I believe that the government and every person in society rather than private companies should fund research into the discovery of new medicines and healing methods.

Research into new types of medicine and treatments are essential for improving health and dealing with diseases - mẫu 2

As money poured into medical treatment research continues to climb around the world, questions are cropping up with regards to whether individuals, private companies or governments should take the brunt of the costs. In my opinion, this should primarily be the job of governments instead of individuals as corporate entities, since the latter’s profit incentive could potentially be dangerous to human lives.

There are those who believe that the private sector should fund medical research, since they not only have the funds, but also an economic reason to provide top of the range medical treatment. Most medical research is done by pharmaceutical or healthcare providers, which could help them develop more cutting-edge technologies aimed at helping people with both common and rare diseases. In return, these companies can get profits as a reward for their innovativeness, which can in turn be spent on R&D, thus repeating the positive cycle.

On the other hand, I believe that the profit incentive of private individuals which theoretically should improve their services could also lead to less-than-ideal consequences. Firstly, drug companies might find ways to cut costs in order to improve profits, which leads to lower quality products. Thus, money poured into research would not be used for making the best treatment, but more on how to make the cheapest one possible. Secondly, it might also be argued that since healthcare and pharmaceuticals are doing what is profitable instead of what is ethical, there might be an incentive to only research programs aimed at the former. For instance, instead of finding a way to cure diseases, drug companies might only try to find out how to alleviate the symptoms.

In conclusion, I argue that given the propensity of private companies to cut costs, medical research should be funded by governments instead of private individuals or institutions.

Research into new types of medicine and treatments are essential for improving health and dealing with diseases - mẫu 3

It is indisputably important for researchers to develop new medical treatments in the battle against poor health and disease. In my opinion, this research should be funded primarily by governments and well-regulated private companies.

Governments are able to concentrate solely on public interests. They are indebted to tax-payers and have a responsibility to direct that money back into various services benefiting the nation at large. A good example of the important role governments play in medical services and treatments is the theory of disease originated by Louis Pasteur while working for the publicly funded University of Lille in France. It is unlikely he would have had the time or resources to conduct his experiments on his own and questionable if a private company would have recognised the commercial value of his work. Government funding functions much the same way today to fund medical projects without a clear path to profits but enormous importance for public health.

However, governments are notoriously slow-moving, under-funded and less innovative than private corporations. Companies are motivated to generate a profit, which pushes them to compete, innovate, and pay for the best minds in the field. Evidence for this is numerous and includes advances in surgical procedures, stem cell therapy, nutrition, pharmaceuticals, cancer research, and emergency medicine. Government funded projects and hospitals have a tendency to become complacent while private companies must innovate to excel. The risk, naturally, is that these companies will charge exorbitant costs and reserve the best medicine for select, wealthy clientele. Government regulation is therefore needed to keep these corporations in check.

In conclusion, the government plays a key role in medical research both as a creative body and a regulator. Private companies should not be vilified for their exploitation of health problems, but they should be kept within clear limits.

Research into new types of medicine and treatments are essential for improving health and dealing with diseases - mẫu 4

Medicine is crucial in combating illness, and even more so when new diseases show up to threaten human health. When it comes to discovering novel cures and treatments, there is a debate of whether it should be up to private companies, individuals, or the government to provide funding. From my point of view, it would be most appropriate for private companies to fund these efforts.

There are several reasons to support the idea that private firms are best suited for financial backing of research into new medicine. A major reason to consider is that private companies are usually well-equipped with technical expertise to oversee funding. To be specific, since medical research takes a long time and results are highly unpredictable, it is necessary to be able to manage the costs and risks well, whereas the people with experience in this kind of task are most likely found in the employment of private companies. Furthermore, private firms that fund research into medicine have to prove that their finances are solid as well. Together with their networking abilities, they might even be able to attract other investors and raise funding.

In contrast, individuals and governments are significantly less suitable as parties to fund medical discoveries. Regarding individuals, because of the expenses involved in researching, it would take a large number of people to fund. This is not always practical, and while there may exist websites that let the public pool their resources for a medical research project, people can be duped into funding an organization that has no accountability. The government, meanwhile, is not a good funder either. Financial support for discovering new medicine and treatments can be impacted by corruption, mismanagement of funds, or by competition with the defence budget or infrastructure budget. As a result, research progress will stagnate.

In conclusion, I believe it is the best idea to let private enterprises financially back projects into medical research.

Research into new types of medicine and treatments are essential for improving health and dealing with diseases - mẫu 5

Studying new medicines and treatments to enhance health and cure illnesses is imperative. In my view, funding for such research should come from either the government or individuals, not private enterprises.

If medical research is funded by private corporations, patients would inevitably bear the burden of increased medication and treatment costs. Indeed, such research necessitates sponsors to cover various expenses, including equipment purchases and staffing. However, for most corporations, profit is often a primary objective, leading them to prioritize revenue generation to prevent losses and maintain profitability. Some profit-driven companies may even pressure researchers to set higher prices for their research outcomes to maximize earnings. Consequently, medication and medical treatments would become more financially inaccessible for patients, particularly for those in poverty, increasing the likelihood of succumbing to illness.

It is the responsibility of governments and individuals to financially support studies aimed at enhancing public health and developing cures for diseases. Firstly, ensuring the quality of life for citizens is a primary governmental duty. To fulfill this obligation, governments must allocate national budgets to research new medicines and medical treatments, aiming to improve the health and well-being of their populations. Secondly, individuals should also contribute financially, as medical research directly impacts their health. As new medications and treatment methods are developed, individuals in society will rely on these advancements when they fall ill.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that government entities and every member of society, rather than private corporations, should finance research endeavors aimed at discovering new medicines and treatment modalities.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• In some countries, only a few young people go to classical music concerts or play classical music. Why is this the case? Should young people be encouraged to attend and learn more?

• Some people think that it is better for older school children to study a large number of subjects and develop a range of knowledge. Others argue that they should study a smaller number of subjects and focus on details. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

• Education for young people is important in many countries. However, others think the government should spend more money on education for the adult populations who cannot read and write. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Today people are surrounded by all types of advertisements. This both affects what people think is important and has a negative impact on people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

---