Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, while others think

Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Đề bài: Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, while others think - mẫu 1

Admittedly, the vital role of art and culture in our modern society is undeniable. This raises the question whether the national budget should be allocated to sponsor artistic and cultural activities. While some people advocate this point of view, a handful of individuals are of the opinion that it might be better if the government does not fund this particular field. From my perspective, although it is true that the state should prioritize many other issues over supporting art and culture, an appropriate amount of money needs to be injected into this.

Those claiming governmental funding on art and culture to be unnecessary usually focus on the presence of numerous pressing social matters. To begin with, poverty and lack of education still exist and burden our life. If the state decides to fund artistic and cultural activities and overlook these two, the consequences are devastating. These include losses of jobs, the widening gap between the two social classes and illiteracy. As can be seen, these unsolved social issues can exert an adverse long-term effect on the whole society and directly afflict the citizens' basic welfare. Therefore, the aching social problems need to be put on agenda, rather than sponsoring art and culture.

From another standpoint, the national budget should be proportionated into subsidizing artistic and cultural activities because they are of great significance to people's spiritual life. It is no doubt that these activities contribute to beautifying and strengthening the community spirit of our society. This is because art is the symbol of a nation, they represent the mindset, the intellect and the history. For example, in Vietnam people celebrate the anniversary of Hung Vuong's death by attending local marches and enjoying the traditional performances to show their respect and appreciation towards the wise king. This has brought together the people, thereby enhancing a sense of community within the society. Not to mention, this is also an effective way for art and culture of a country to be preserved and bequeathed.

In conclusion, although governmental financial aid on arts should not be put to the forefront, I would contend that an adequate amount of national fund should be spent on this field because it does bring about significant advantages.

Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, while others think - mẫu 2

With the scarcity of government funding, wise choices need to be made to allocate the money. A segment of the population believes that spending on art and culture will be advantageous to the citizens, whilst others hold a contrarian view. I take the view that the government should only spend minimal amounts on art and culture and allocate their funds to more important causes.

Some believe that art and culture should be supported by the government to ensure the nation's heritage and identity are protected. Although preserving the nation's heritage and identity does not directly impact the nation's economic well-being, doing so would improve the population's sense of togetherness and belonging and boosts patriotism. For example, the government of China spends large amounts of money to re-acquire works of art lost during its Cultural Revolution in order to provide its public a meaningful repository of art and culture to appreciate.

On the other hand, others believe that government spending should not be used to support art and culture as there are more important needs for the funds. For example, healthcare and education would more directly impact on the lives of the population, with the funds spent in these areas directly benefiting the population through better health, and improved skills with which to complete globally. This in turn may boost the livelihood of the people, and eventually grow the net revenues of the nation.

In summary, I hold the view that whilst governments need to support art and culture in order to reach a larger population of people, the bulk of government spending should be made on more pressing needs of the people such as health and education. Spending on more important priorities would also enable the government to improve the lives of the people and their revenues, which is a self-perpetuating cycle of then having more funds which to spend on art and culture.

Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, while others think - mẫu 3

Opinions diverge on the necessity of funding cultural activities. While some claim it is an unnecessary investment, others believe both citizens and cultures would benefit if governments were to provide financial support for art and culture. I will discuss both views and state my own opinion in this essay.

On the one hand, many people oppose investing in cultural activities because there are more serious issues to address. The deterioration of transport infrastructure in many cities, for example, is the major reason for the increased number of traffic accidents. Using money for the construction of new roads and highways would bring about immediate effects and save thousands of lives. In addition, nations across the globe are facing many environmental problems that require urgent attention, namely pollution and natural resource depletion. National leaders, therefore, should join forces with scientists to combat these issues by allocating financial resources to the development of renewable and environmentally friendly sources of energy. There is no point in spending money on cultural activities before ensuring a safe and clean environment for citizens.

Advocates of art and culture, on the other hand, argue that cultural activities play an important role in people’s lives. Cultural events, like Tet holiday or Christmas, are occasions when family members gather together, which helps to strengthen the sense of family and community and further enriches people’s lives. Moreover, funding these activities helps to preserve cultural diversity, especially in such a globalised world where so much culture is being lost and forgotten. The Vietnamese government, for instance, has constructed many museums that solely exhibit examples of ethnic minority culture, whose populations are decreasing at an alarming rate.

In conclusion, I believe that cultural activities are of great significance and require attention and financial support from governments. However, it is also the government’s duty to address issues in transportation and the environment to protect citizens’ lives and maintain a healthy environment for people to live.

Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, while others think - mẫu 4

Regarding cultural activities, some people propose a complete cut in government funding, while others argue that culture is an indispensable aspect of our society. I strongly support the latter view because we can significantly benefit from cultural activities.

Works of art such as songs or poems are sometimes deemed as unnecessary because they do not satisfy any materialistic need. To some people, it seems unfair to use the government budget for recreational purposes while millions are still living in poverty. Proponents of this view demand the government stop funding art and cultural programs; this way, people wanting leisure will have to pay for their own needs. However, I would say cultural activities are so important to our society; they warrant dedicated support at a national level.

First, it is simply wrong to think that art and culture do not contribute to social welfare. Aside from the decorative value, artistic works also have their practical functions; an aesthetic building embraces both functionality and harmony with the surrounding area, for example. Second, art and cultural activities are tools to promote social cohesion - the bond between people and people. Throughout history, cultural festivals such as Halloween have played a pivotal role in strengthening the community and providing entertainment. Therefore, it is safe to say that cultural funding by the government brings benefits to not only the rich but also the poor.

To summarize, while some people oppose government spending on cultural activities, I still side with the view that art and culture are essential to our life.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays?

• The most important function of music is that it helps people reduce stress. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

• Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students should spend time on important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

• Some people think that children should aim to do their best at what they are doing, while others believe it is not necessary for them. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

• People say that it is a waste of time for high school students to learn literature, such as novels and poems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

---