People say that it is a waste of time for high school students to learn literature

People say that it is a waste of time for high school students to learn literature, such as novels and poems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Đề bài: People say that it is a waste of time for high school students to learn literature, such as novels and poems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

People say that it is a waste of time for high school students to learn literature - mẫu 1

Some argue that studying literature, such as novels and poems, is an inefficient use of time for high school students. However, I disagree and believe that learning literature offers significant benefits.

Some individuals contend that dedicating time to literature in high school is not practical. They argue that the focus should be on more practical subjects directly applicable to future careers. For instance, subjects like mathematics and science are often considered more important for developing critical thinking and problem-solving skills required in the job market. Moreover, they argue that literature does not provide tangible skills that can be utilized in real-world scenarios.

Contrary to the belief that studying literature is a waste of time, it offers numerous advantages for high school students. Literature provides a platform for students to develop empathy and emotional intelligence by immersing themselves in different characters' perspectives and experiences. Moreover, analyzing literary works enhances critical thinking and analytical skills, which are essential for academic success and personal growth. Additionally, literature fosters creativity and imagination, encouraging students to think beyond conventional boundaries.

In conclusion, while some may argue that learning literature is a waste of time for high school students, I strongly believe that it is a valuable pursuit. Literature offers unique opportunities for personal and intellectual development, nurturing essential skills that contribute to students' overall success in academics and beyond. Therefore, integrating literature into high school curricula remains indispensable despite differing opinions on its significance.

People say that it is a waste of time for high school students to learn literature - mẫu 2

There currently exists a growing reluctance among high school students to spend time reading literature, as novels and poems are seemingly impractical for their future developments. In critical opposition to this claim, this essay argues that literature plays an important role in educating the young generation.

Learning literature could improve high school students' writing skills, which are crucial for tertiary education and future career prospect. Because literature not only acts as a form of authors' expression but also reflects the society in which they live, absorbing the thoughts of different authors could enrich their general knowledge in various fields that may be useful for both formal and informal writing tasks. Moreover, thanks to the wide lexical resource and language arts in prominent authors' masterpieces, students could enhance their effectiveness of language articulation, an essentiality in writing competence. A typical example is that high achievers in literature at high schools tend to become undergraduates who triumph in academic achievements, because they have had a deposit of various innovative ideas in different fields as well as an ability to communicate masterfully through written assignments.

Students' emotional intelligence (El) impacting professional or academic performance alike could also be developed through critically comprehending iterature. Because of the reflection of authors' lives and societies in literature, and the borderline-authentic dynamics between characters, analyzing literary works could provide students with opportunities to fully immerse into different mindsets and figure out others' perspectives. As a result, empathy and emotional management as cornerstones of El could be strengthened. According to many empirical studies, students with high El level are likely to strive in their career, because they are adept at collaborating with others and relieving their stress when dealing with problems.

In conclusion, learning literature is essential for high school students because literary pieces encourage students to sharpen their writing ability and boost their EQ level.

People say that it is a waste of time for high school students to learn literature - mẫu 3

People hold different views about the role of literature as a compulsory subject amongst high shool students. Personally, I partly agree that this subject is an unnecessary burden on students.

On the one hand, I would argue that it is not vitally important to require school students to learn literature. One main reason is that they may not like this sector of study, and they seem reluctant to study it. For one thing, in some certain countries, like Vietnam, there is a big issue in the approach of teaching it, meaning that students are forced to feel the poem or story taught in the same way given by their teachers or they are not allowed to express their own feeling and opinion in a free way. They therefore tend to learn the subject by rote instead of being encouraged to nurture their creativity, possibly making them fed up. Furthermore, due to the boredom of learning this subject in some particular education systems, students cannot be fully aware of how to apply its knowledge into their future career.

On the other hand, there are some primary reasons I would provide in favour of the importance of literature at school. Firstly, learning it is considered as an effective way for students to enrich their knowledge of history, traditions, cultures or customs of their own countries because of the fact that their ancestors' life and relevant aspects are vividly reflected in works of literature. Secondly, literature is beneficial to sharpen their language skills simply because a good range of vocabulary is well applied to the description of the life, feeling, attitude, or behaviour of characters as well as the stunning lanscape. By learning the subject, they can learn how to use their mother tongue more properly.

In conclusion, I agree with the statement in question to some extent for a wide range of primary grounds, which have just been mentioned above.

People say that it is a waste of time for high school students to learn literature - mẫu 4

Some people believe that it is a waste of time for students to study literature in high school. Personally, I couldn’t disagree more with this opinion.

Firstly, there are a range of benefits for high school students who study literature. Studying novels can give students a deeper insight into the history and culture of a particular place or time. For example, although the storyline in many novels may be fictional, the reader can still gain a good sense of the culture and customs of certain places and periods of time, and this is usually a much more entertaining way of understanding history compared to reading regular history books. Secondly, studying literature helps students to learn more about language, which increases their ability to express themselves and communicate with others. This is particularly important these days as the use of the internet and social media has had a myriad of negative impacts on people’s communication skills.

Furthermore, literature is a form of art, and it cannot be argued that the world needs artists to make it a better place to live. Without art, the world would be a ghastly, boring place. I believe that literature should be considered as an important part of any high school curriculum as it helps to stimulate students’ artistic intelligence and provides them with a break from the monotony of logic-based subjects such as math and science. All subjects play an important role in the development of students, and literature is no exception. These days, there seems to be too much attention given to the importance of science and math-based subjects, as they are what many people believe drive a country’s economy, however I believe that art and culture should be considered as important as the economy.

In conclusion, not only does literature hold an important place within a high school’s curriculum, but also within society itself, and therefore I believe it should be held in high regard.

People say that it is a waste of time for high school students to learn literature - mẫu 5

Although some might think that high school students should focus more on other subjects but literature, I strongly disagree that students should stop studying novels and poems.

The first reason why students should continue learning about literature is that they can improve their communication skills. For example, students can expand their vocabulary, learn new ways of expressing themselves, and know how to put forth a logical argument. Many great writers have confirmed that the secret to better writing is via extensive pursuing. Learning about literature also helps with verbal communication, as students can pick up slang from a novel to use in real life. Also, there are many characters in famous Vietnamese works used to refer to certain qualities, such as using Hoan Thu to represent a jealous person.

The second reason students should learn more about literature is that students can learn a lot about Vietnamese culture. Because literature reflects peoples' lives in a certain region during a certain period, much is revealed through studying novels and poems. For example, students can learn what life was like from reading Chi Pheo, a famous short story. They can imagine what philosophy the villagers were practicing and what they did for a living. Moreover, students can interpret how much influence other cultures have on Vietnam through reading. An example of this is by examining the language used in literature to see where those words originate.

In conclusion, there are multiple reasons why literature should be a big part of the curriculum. I strongly disagree with the opinion that learning literature is a waste of time.

People say that it is a waste of time for high school students to learn literature - mẫu 6

A lot of people oppose the inclusion of literature in high school curriculum, and some have claimed that learning this subject is a poor time investment. Personally, I strongly disagree with this statement, and I will present two arguments for the considerable relevance of this subject.

First of all, literature lessons allow students to deepen the understanding of their country's history. For example, many Vietnamese short stories such as "Chị Dâu”, “Lão Hạc" and similar works written in the revolutionary era depict the daily sufferings the common people endured under the French and American colonialism. When reading these classics, Vietnamese pupils can not only feel but also vividly visualize the poor living conditions in these historical periods. In this way, literature knowledge is a valuable asset providing young people with insights about the forces that shape their country's past and present.

Secondly, high school students can also develop critical thinking during literature lessons. Many literature classes train students to write up social commentary essays in which they can voice their opinions and evaluations regarding current social trends, thus sharpening their analytical minds. At the same time, novels can expose young readers to thought-provoking ideas. As prime examples, stories such as "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley and "1984" by George Orwell can introduce students to complex topics such as the meaning of life and value of freedom.

In summary, although on the surface, literature seems like a boring subject only reserved for bookworms, I believe that at its core, literature is a powerful tool which can enrich students' understanding of the world and of themselves.

People say that it is a waste of time for high school students to learn literature - mẫu 7

Many today claim that learning about literature should no longer be a key component of the high school curriculum. In my opinion, there are practical reasons for this sentiment, but literature still serves a purpose.

Proponents of this reform argue other subjects deserve prioritisation. There is little doubt that in the 21st century, the most important subjects for students’ future careers relate to the sciences, such as engineering and computer science, or the practical humanities, like business. The earlier that students begin specialising, the more likely they are to have a head start in the competition and secure a well-paying job immediately after graduating high school or university. In contrast, the novels and poems that students read in high school are usually completely forgotten within a few years and do not teach any tangible skills that will help them advance in the real world.

Nonetheless, literature contains many of the most important and fundamental truths about the human condition. Life is about more than a career and great authors tackle the most fundamental philosophical and psychological questions. For example, the masters of 19th century Russian literature, including Tolstoy and Dostoevsky, are primarily concerned with human psychology and how this fits into a larger context of man’s search for meaning. Their exploration of these issues is relevant to everyone and cannot be replaced with a steady career. Moreover, the way in which great writers develop their themes, the aesthetic quality of their writing itself, imparts to careful readers the importance of artistic expression and may help them see outside the narrow modern confines of accumulating the most material wealth.

In conclusion, the utilitarian benefits of studying practical subjects do not outweigh the deeper values of literature. It is therefore advisable that literature be emphasised in high school classrooms.

People say that it is a waste of time for high school students to learn literature - mẫu 8

Many claim that high school students have to study too many subjects, some of which are of little or no value at all like literature. While their arguments may be justified to some extent, I would argue that we should not overlook the benefits that literature can bring to one’s personal development.

People who do not see the value of teaching literature at high school argue that novels and poetry are not practical and useful for children’s future. Firstly, very few careers require one to analyze or critique a literary work. Rather, a vast majority of professions demand practical skills and knowledge in scientific or economic fields. Secondly, literature taught at school tends to be outdated and irrelevant to our current reality.  Most of the novels and poems were written in the distant past and capture long-gone days and issues. Therefore, not much knowledge gained could be used for working purposes.

However, I firmly believe in tremendous values embedded in this subject. From a practical perspective, the skillset fostered in literature classes is just as essential for working adults as in any other subject. One cannot deny that the ability to use written and spoken language efficiently is crucial for effective communication in all aspects of life. Critical reading is another fundamental skill a person needs in the information era. Furthermore, unrealistic as they might look, fictional works and poetry convey moral and social messages that have timeless qualities. For example, students learn about companionship in the poem called ‘Comrade’, or family ties and problems in the novel called ‘The farewell of the dolls’.

In conclusion, although some may think literature is an unnecessary subject, I am convinced that learning literary pieces helps students to develop their language ability and raise awareness of moral and social issues.

People say that it is a waste of time for high school students to learn literature - mẫu 9

Some people argue that teaching literature in high schools is a sheer waste of time since it has little to no practical value. However, I contend that it provides essential moral orientation to students.

On the one hand, high schoolers might find it hard to apply literature lessons to real life. Indeed, writers or poets compose their works at a time that is fundamentally different from the present teenager’s world. More importantly, characters in novels are clearly fictional, possessing a set of behaviours that are not always relatable in modern terms. For instance, throughout the poem “Odyssey”, the hero resolved to use violence to settle all disagreements, an approach that would not work in our current, more peaceful civilisation.

On the other hand, it appears to me that this subject is crucial to the moral development of those at high school. While studying novels or poems, they are able to empathise with the characters, understanding their circumstances in the given settings instead of making subjective judgements. As a result, young learners would likely become empathetic graduates who are willing to appreciate contradicting opinions and cherish differences, eventually becoming more open-minded citizens. That is a testament why literature should be included in the school curriculum.

In conclusion, although novels or poems may seem to be impractical, I am convinced that literature must have a place in high school programs to nurture well-educated citizens. Nevertheless, teachers should adopt more creative teaching methods such as role playing or plot construction to make lessons more relevant to their students.

People say that it is a waste of time for high school students to learn literature - mẫu 10

Literature, including poems and novels, is often considered by some as unnecessary for high school students, who should instead focus on more practical subjects. However, I firmly believe that studying literature is essential for the holistic development of students and should not be considered a waste of time.

Firstly, literature plays a crucial role in developing critical thinking and analytical skills. When students engage with poems and novels, they are required to interpret and analyze the text, which enhances their cognitive abilities. This critical thinking is a valuable skill that can be applied across various subjects and in real-life situations. Additionally, literature often addresses complex themes and moral dilemmas, allowing students to develop empathy and a deeper understanding of human emotions and experiences.

Moreover, studying literature can improve students’ language and communication skills. Through exposure to a wide range of vocabulary and writing styles, students can enhance their own writing and verbal expression. This is particularly important in today’s digital age, where effective communication is a highly sought-after skill in the professional world.

Furthermore, literature provides students with a window into different cultures, historical periods, and societal issues. By exploring diverse literary works, students can gain a broader perspective of the world around them and develop a greater appreciation for diversity and inclusivity. This exposure can foster a sense of empathy and understanding towards individuals from different backgrounds, ultimately contributing to a more harmonious and interconnected society.

In conclusion, the study of literature, including poems and novels, is far from a waste of time for high school students. It offers numerous benefits, including the development of critical thinking, language skills, and cultural awareness. Therefore, I strongly believe that literature should continue to be an integral part of the high school curriculum.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• It is suggested that primary school children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals. Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages?

• The qualities that help people reach success in modern life cannot be learned in university or other academic institutions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

• Some people think that schools should choose students according to their academic abilities, while others think it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

• Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age. Some think they should begin at least 7 years old. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

• Some people think children have the freedom to make mistakes, while other people believe that adults should prevent children from making mistakes. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

---