Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students

Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students should spend time on important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Đề bài: Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students should spend time on important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion

Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students - mẫu 1

People have different views concerning the importance of studying food science and cooking at educational institutions. While some argue that students should focus on key subjects that can boost their career prospects, I believe culinary courses are of paramount significance in leading a healthy and independent lifestyle.

On the one hand, the core disciplines standard at most schools are imperative for one’s future career. Academic subjects such as math and literature can provide an individual with the foundational knowledge to smoothly transit into a professional working environment. For example, logical thinking acquired during math lessons and critical thinking fostered by literature are prerequisites to nuanced problem-solving skills. Recent research has indicated that the average income of those with the abovementioned competencies is higher than that of unskilled laborers and the general workforce. Therefore, a successful career is a realistic possibility when one focuses diligently on the important subjects at school.

On the other hand, possessing a solid understanding of food and cooking can ensure not only general well-being but also serve as a basic survival skill. First and foremost, schoolers often fail to attend to nutrition in their daily meals, which likely leads to unhealthy eating habits. Conditions caused by those occupations such as malnutrition and obesity are detrimental to the healthy growth of the younger generation. Secondly, food preparation is useful for living independently. Students who are proficient with culinary skills will be more capable of adjusting to living on their own. Indeed, food science and cooking could enable them to modify their dietary patterns to live healthier without either readily available dishes at homes or processed foods at convenience stores.

In conclusion, while some advocate prioritizing traditional school curriculums based on academic subjects, I believe imparting a knowledge of nutrition and food preparation generates a great sense of independence and develops healthy eating habits for graduates. Thus, courses about food should be added to the school curriculum.

Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students - mẫu 2

Some today advocate the teaching of food science and preparation in schools as a key 21st century skill. In my opinion, though the expense is a potential obstacle, such a proposal is justifiable.

Opponents of this proposed curriculum shift argue that it would only benefit more affluent school systems. The majority of schools, particularly those in inner cities and remote rural regions, struggle already to maintain quality facilities and employ experienced, dedicated teachers. The idea of building a kitchen for student-use and keeping it stocked with ingredients as well as the sophisticated equipment required to teach about, and practice molecular gastronomy is simply unrealistic. Critics justly point out that such money would be better spent maintaining more essential infrastructure such as the fields, classrooms, and school buildings themselves.

Nonetheless, assuming government funding is available, this would be an ideal method of combining practical skills with scientific theory. One of the most common complaints among students after graduation is that the vast majority of their studies were impractical and did not prepare them for adulthood. Learning to cook on one’s own would go a long way towards answering this criticism. However, the true gains would come from the linking of theory and practice. Many scientific theories are abstract and difficult to both understand and retain later in life. The practical application in cooking would not only help students grasp the concepts initially but repeated review from making meals in one’s daily life would likely ensure permanent understanding.

In conclusion, food science may seem trivial, and its application might pose financial hurdles but it is worth enacting in order to educate students well. Where possible, governments should allocate the necessary funding.

Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students - mẫu 3

It is true that many people are utterly divided on the need to teach food science at school. Some people argue that students should pursue culinary courses, while I side with others who support the idea of focusing on core subjects.

On the one hand, profound knowledge and deep insights into food constituents encourage students to become more health-conscious. As they are well-versed in food science, which offers them methods to differentiate between healthy and unhealthy ingredients, they can reduce their consumption of protein, fats and carbohydrates. Thanks to hands-on experience in cooking classes, they are more likely to make modifications to their daily diets, preventing diseases such as obesity or diabetes. Secondly, as students are instructed on food hygiene, they can protect themselves from foodborne illnesses. For example, they can learn how to treat raw materials properly before cooking, which protects themselves from food poisoning.

On the other hand, I am of the opinion that school time should be allocated to compulsory subjects. As the foremost purpose of schooling is equipping students with essential knowledge for entrance exams, students should be dedicated to learning main fields such as mathematics, literature and physics. Furthermore, schoolers are now being put under enormous pressure from onerous assignments. If food science is introduced to the school curriculum, students will have to shoulder heavier workloads. This hardship can make students stressed, affecting their school performances.

In conclusion, despite the advantages that understanding about food and cooking can offer to students, I am more convinced that in the midst of teaching food science and following test-oriented curricula, advocacy should be provided for the latter tendency.

Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students - mẫu 4

Education has always been a public debate since it shapes the future of the next generation. While some people think students should only focus on essential courses, I believe the food science program would enhance the current curriculum for high schools.

On the one hand, some people insist students on studying fundamental subjects because these subjects seem to be more important for career trajectories. Most schools are expected to provide essential knowledge from coursework such as Math, Literature, and Language and to build up a strong academic foundation that will apply to students’ future jobs. A student who wishes to become a software engineer, for example, should obtain a comprehensive understanding of Mathematics since the job requires rigorous math knowledge and logic to build feasible algorithms. It is likely that students will spend more time on focal subjects that potentially contribute to a better career prospect.

Nevertheless, others suggest complementing food science programs for students that I believe will benefit students by increasing their independence. Since food is a life necessity, students need to acquire basic information and cooking skills in order to self-support and adapt to any circumstances. For instance, students who study abroad will likely be exhausted due to demanding curriculums and without sufficient care from parents. Therefore, they should be aware of nutritious food and easy cooking methods in order to boost their health while still saving time for tight schedules. Having knowledge of food and cooking, students can generally understand their body needs and customize their daily diets based on their conditions in order to maintain a healthy lifestyle.

In conclusion, it seems evident that both notions have their own unique advantages, but I believe that food knowledge is a compulsory component for students. Schools should also create a balanced curriculum with these subjects in order to prepare holistic education and practical experience for students.

Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students - mẫu 5

Many people acknowledge that learning the science of food and how to prepare it is imperative for students. Others consider that merely learning academic subjects during school time would be a reasonable choice. I opine that students can simultaneously learn mandatory subjects and other essential skills such as cooking and food science as they are crucial skills for everyone to learn from their early days.

To begin with, the supporters of the former view believe that schools should focus on teaching the students about food and how to prepare it. They think that teaching food science is imperative as its knowledge helps children in the future. Moreover, if a child is knowledgeable of food science and how nutritious food would keep their body fit, that would invigorate them to choose correct food habits. In addition, cooking is a necessity and should be taught to everyone irrespective of gender. Furthermore, learning the science of food and how to prepare it can also drive motivation to learn about other related subjects.

However, others who think school days should be used to learn essential subjects such as mathematics and science would argue that these subjects help students make successful careers later in life. These subjects construct a solid background of knowledge for the pupils and help them catch up with a constantly changing world. As per their set of beliefs, students can acquire knowledge related to food in their life after their education.

In conclusion, even though some classes may be fundamental to passing the tests, preparing a proper healthy meal should be taught at school since it provides children with a vital capability to take care of themselves when they are on their own.

Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students - mẫu 6

In today’s time, there is a great deal of suggestions being made to the study program for students and the subjects included therein. While some propose that the science and preparation of food should be added to courses, others insist on giving priority to more important subjects. Personally, I side with the latter view.

On the one hand, there are certain benefits to be gained from the study of food. Firstly, scientific knowledge about food encourages students to take a health-conscious approach to their diet. Because when students understand how food constituents like proteins, fats, carbohydrates, affect their physical condition, they may become more willing to adopt a balanced diet in preference to fast food. Also, food science entails the study of preparation methods that guide students towards food safety. Specifically, students can learn about the proper way of treating food, like dehydrating or freezing, as well as how to preserve and contain them appropriately to prevent bacterial growth. This, in turn, will minimize risks of foodborne illness.

On the other hand, I believe that students’ time should be dedicated to the learning of main subjects. The primary goal of school education should be to prepare students for one pivotal end, that is the university entrance exam. This means placing more emphasis on core subjects like Math, Literature and English, which are practical subjects for evaluating students’ performance. Furthermore, it is likely that food science would only be introduced as a side-subject and account for one session in students’ weekly timetable. In other words, students’ engagement will be at a minimum, thereby limiting the subject’s applicability.

In conclusion, despite the several benefits offered by the incorporation of food science into students’ curriculum, I am still of the opinion that students should devote their time mainly to core subjects.

Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students - mẫu 7

Whether the science of food and food preparation should be incorporated into the mandatory curriculum has been a subject of debate recently. While some people believe that students should get a good grasp of this field of knowledge, it is my contention that more time allocated for academic subjects will be in their best interest.

Not only does acquiring a fair knowledge of such an essential life skill as food science and preparation prove beneficial to an individual himself, but it works in society’s favour as well. To begin with, the study of food lays a sound foundation on which an advantageous diet may be built. In fact, ensuring one’s physical well-being by a wisely planned diet is the requisite for taking good care of himself, which, if achieved, reduces morbidity. Consequently, a scenario in which life quality grows while the economy benefits indirectly from the increase in the labour force and labour productivity is now likely.

Having said that, I still believe other academic subjects should be of priority, since the more effort one puts into these subjects, the better his job prospects are later in his life. It is known that most well-paid jobs nowadays require a definite amount of higher education or training courses, which demands a prerequisite comprehension of the fundamentals of some social or natural sciences. Devotion to these important subjects hence means better groundwork for future training and opens up more career choices. On top of that, it favours professional development guaranteeing a fulfilled life.

In short, although introducing the study of food as an obligatory module on the syllabus is deemed rewarding in some ways, I am still an advocate of greater commitment to core subjects.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Some people think that children should aim to do their best at what they are doing, while others believe it is not necessary for them. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

• People say that it is a waste of time for high school students to learn literature, such as novels and poems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

• It is suggested that primary school children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals. Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages?

• The qualities that help people reach success in modern life cannot be learned in university or other academic institutions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

• Some people think that schools should choose students according to their academic abilities, while others think it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

---