Some people think that it is better for older school children to study a large number of subjects

Some people think that it is better for older school children to study a large number of subjects and develop a range of knowledge. Others argue that they should study a smaller number of subjects and focus on details. Discuss both views and give your opinion hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Đề bài: Some people think that it is better for older school children to study a large number of subjects and develop a range of knowledge. Others argue that they should study a smaller number of subjects and focus on details. Discuss both views and give your opinion

Some people think that it is better for older school children to study a large number of subjects - mẫu 1

The age-old debate in education circles often circles back to whether older school children should be exposed to a plethora of subjects, ensuring holistic learning, or should they narrow down their study spectrum, delving deeply into fewer areas. Both approaches, particularly in the Vietnamese context, carry distinct merits and pitfalls.

There is a compelling argument to be made for providing students with a broad-based education. One primary advantage of this approach is that students can discern their innate talents and passions, given the diverse array of subjects they are exposed to. Vietnam, a rapidly developing nation, requires multifaceted professionals in various fields. If students were not exposed to subjects like art or technology at an early stage, the nation might inadvertently stifle potential pioneers in these arenas. However, this method is not without drawbacks. A sweeping study plan can leave students overwhelmed, leading to superficial knowledge, as teachers might race to cover the syllabus rather than ensuring true comprehension. In a class in Hanoi, for instance, where students juggled between ten subjects, it was observed that genuine interest was often substituted with rote learning to merely pass examinations.

However, I believe that focusing on a select few subjects, allowing students to delve deeper, is a more pragmatic approach. It prepares students for specialized professions and in-depth academic pursuits. In Vietnam, as the demand for experts in fields like IT and Environmental Sciences grows, a concentrated study method can produce professionals adequately equipped to tackle contemporary challenges. Furthermore, a deeper understanding of subjects can nurture critical thinkers and problem solvers, invaluable assets in today's complex world. For instance, students in Da Nang who took an intensive course in environmental sciences were better poised to propose sustainable solutions to the city's pollution problems than their broadly educated counterparts.

In conclusion, while introducing students to a wide array of subjects can kindle undiscovered passions and talents, I am more inclined to endorse a focused educational approach. It not only gears up students for specialized roles in society but also fosters in-depth understanding and analytical thinking, attributes crucial for modern-day challenges.

Some people think that it is better for older school children to study a large number of subjects - mẫu 2

In recent years, the number of subjects that students have to study at school has become an issue of widespread public concern. There are conflicting views toward this growing trend of whether it is necessary to offer a wide range of subjects for children. Some support the idea. However, others argue that children should study a smaller number of subjects to specialize in intensive fields. Advocates for both sides are reasonable to a certain extent as now it will be explained before a final conclusion is reached.

On the one hand, those against the latter’s point of view may argue that there are enormous benefits for older schoolchildren to study a variety of subjects at school. This is especially true when it comes to eastern societies, where it has long been perceived that students are encouraged to study a large number of subjects such as math, history, geography and physics in order to have comprehensive developments rather than just study some courses and focus in details. Accordingly, children can handle complicated problems in their life with extensive knowledge and essential skills from accessing different fields. It is understandable why the variety of chosen subjects at school is of significant importance to ensure the wholesome development as well as heighten their employability and success.

On the other hand, there are no less convincing arguments to say that studying a limited number of subjects has considerable advantages. Firstly, learning a smaller range of subjects helps children to study more effectively. It is true that focusing on fewer subjects lessens the pressure of studying for many exams and also reduces the distraction since their brain does not have to handle multi-questions of different fields. Secondly, children can choose a set of subjects that they like, or they are good at. In fact, once they are able to learn what they want, their higher motivation will surely enhance their academic results. With this support since children are young, they are likely to develop fully in their own fields, which leads to higher probability of success in the future.

From what has been discussed, one can reach a conclusion that it is hard to choose a suitable number of subjects for children at school because some students may be good at what the others are not. However, I am of the opinion that it is better for children to study a limited number of subjects at school.

Some people think that it is better for older school children to study a large number of subjects - mẫu 3

It is believed by some that older school children should study a wide array of subjects to foster a diverse knowledge base or focus on a smaller number of subjects for in-depth understanding has sparked considerable debate. This essay will explore both perspectives and offer my viewpoint on the matter.

One argument in favor of students studying numerous subjects is that it provides them with a well-rounded education. This approach exposes students to a variety of disciplines, nurturing a broader proficiency and a diverse skill set. Moreover, it allows them to discover their interests and strengths, aiding future career choices. Additionally, society benefits from individuals with versatile knowledge as they can adapt to various roles and challenges.

On the other hand, proponents of a focused curriculum argue that studying a smaller number of subjects enables students to delve deeply into their chosen field. This can lead to a higher level of expertise, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. Specialization can also improve employability in today's competitive job market, where expertise is highly valued.

From my standpoint, a balanced approach is ideal. While studying a large number of subjects is valuable for fostering well-rounded individuals, older school children should also have the option to specialize in areas of their choice. This flexibility accommodates diverse learning preferences and career aspirations. It's crucial to strike a balance between breadth and depth to meet the varying needs of students.

In conclusion, the debate over whether older school children should study a variety of subjects or focus on a smaller number is nuanced. A combination of both approaches can provide students with the opportunity to develop a comprehensive skill set while nurturing their passions and potential areas of expertise. This tailored approach can better prepare them for future challenges and opportunities.

Some people think that it is better for older school children to study a large number of subjects - mẫu 4

When it comes to the topic concerning the efficacy of cultivating students, people’s answers may differ greatly from one to another. An array of people considers that exposing students to a wide range of subjects might be justifiable, contributing to a well-rounded education while some other individuals envision that a few numbers of specific professional training might be superior. Well, this essay will hold a discussion about the two sides and formulate my own opinion. Considering exposing the students to a wide range of subjects to absorb knowledge, it is understandable, particularly in such a globalized world. It is widely acknowledged that human beings have access to the information age via the internet, demanding more diverse skills both in terms of hunting for jobs and constructing the world. Plus, with the prevalence of world globalization, students might have more chances to get engaged in international business and communicate with people from different cultures. Therefore, immersing themselves in various subjects, like history, science, philosophy, and humanity courses, the students can not only adapt themselves well to the rapidly changing job market, increasing job opportunities in the fierce competition from outside but also enhance their abilities to navigate through international business environment. So, based on what I have mentioned, there are some validities for this argument. The opponent might argue that specific professional training courses might be more efficient. Well, considering the limited time and energy for individuals, it is crucial for students to concentrate on a few specific subjects, increasing their chances of becoming experts and achieving great success academically. This is just because this focused approach helps the students have more time and energy to delve deep into the particular fields they choose and obtain specialized knowledge and skills. For example, if an individual wants to be a doctor, it is much better for them to focus on studying medicine and health care subjects. There are abundant medical academic terms and experiments that need to be done by students who are going to be a doctor. A well-rounded education might not achieve the same level of success the specific professional training offers. In light of these two arguments, both two sides have their merits and how to strike the balance between these two might be considered sincerely. According to my understanding, due to its academic efficacy, specific professional training must be prioritized, compared with the results of the superficial understanding from studying various subjects. However, imposing students into different subjects could help cultivate critical thinking, empathy, and kindness among students. Well, the appropriate number of subjects introduced to the students in a controlled manner might help strengthen both academic success and diversity of knowledge.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Education for young people is important in many countries. However, others think the government should spend more money on education for the adult populations who cannot read and write. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Today people are surrounded by all types of advertisements. This both affects what people think is important and has a negative impact on people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

• There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays?

• The most important function of music is that it helps people reduce stress. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

---