The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Đề bài: The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 1

The table data presents information about the types of Australian families who were poverty-stricken in 1999. It also shows the number and proportion of such impoverished families for the same year.

Overall, more than 1.83 million Australian families were poor in 1999, and it comprised just over one-tenth of the total Australian households. Furthermore, poverty was more prevalent among soles parents and singles without any children.

As the data suggest, one out of five sole parents in Australia was destitute and it was the highest percentage of poverty among the given family types in 1999. The higher number of poor families, however, were the couples with children accounting for approximately one million households. 7% couples without children, on the other hand, were not affluent. 19% Single Australians without any child were needy while this rate among the elder citizens was fewer - 6% single ages person and 4% aged couple were poor, and the total number of such families were 54,000 and 48,000 respectively.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 2

The table data outlines the ratio and number of impoverished families in Australia in the year 1999.

It is evident that more than one-tenth of Australian families, approximately 1.8 million in total, lived in poverty in 1999, and couples with children made the highest number of destitute families.

According to the table data, only 6% aged singles and 4% aged couple lived in poverty in 1999. It is evident that elder Australians were economically stronger than their younger counterparts. Again, 19% of singles without any children were not affluent and their total number was just over 0.35 million. Compared to that, only 7% of couples with no children suffered from poverty. Furthermore, sole parents who were poor in 1999 were 232,000 in number and their poverty ratio was 21%, the highest. Finally, 12% of couples with children lived in the destitute situation in 1999 and their percentage was 12% and the total number was 933,000. This type of family had the largest number of poverty-stricken households, though, their percentage was lower than that of poor sole parents and singles with no children.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 3

The table presents data regarding the poor families of different household types in Australia in 1999.

Generally speaking, 11% of all Australian households lived in poverty in 1999, and among them, sole parents and singles without any child were the highest in percentages that lived in hardship.

According to the given data, more than 1.8 million families in Australia lived in economic misfortune in 1999 that formed 11% of the total households. Among them, around 50 thousand poor families came from both the single-aged person and aged couple type families who formed 6% and 4% of the total of that family types. Sole parents and singles without children formed the largest percentage of poor families and their percentages were consecutively 21% and 19% of their family types. The highest percentage of poor families was from sole parents and the highest number of needy families was from couples with children type. Comparatively, couples with no child had less poverty percentage than the single with no children family types. It is obvious that senior Austrlains suffered less from poverty than the sole parents and single persons with no child.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 4

The table lists the number and proportion of poverty-stricken families from various types of Australian households in 1999.

In general, more than 1.83 million Australian households were impoverished, and elder Australians were more economically affluent than other family types.

Looking at the details, 'sole parents', 'singles with no children' and 'couples with children' were listed as the high majority of poor family types. They accounted for 21%, 19%, and 12% poor family types respectively in their category in 1999. Almost one million couples with children were poverty-stricken family types, the highest, and single Australian had a similar condition in this year.

On the other hand, 'aged couple', 'single-aged person', and 'couple with no children' had a low proportion of poverty accounting for 4%, 6% and 7% poor family types respectively in their family category. Interestingly, couples without children were more economically stable than their counterparts with children.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 5

The table provides data on the prevalence of poverty among various household types in Australia during the year 1999.

Evidently, single individuals experienced higher poverty rates compared to couples, and households with children were more susceptible to poverty than those without. Conversely, elderly individuals demonstrated significantly lower poverty levels.

Examining the data, it is apparent that single individuals faced higher poverty rates, with just over one-fifth, or 21%, living below the poverty line. In stark contrast, only 12% of couples were classified as poor. This indicates a substantial disparity in poverty levels between single individuals and couples in Australia in 1999.

Furthermore, the presence of children played a crucial role in determining poverty rates. Single parents, constituting just over one-fifth of the population, experienced a poverty rate of 21%, significantly higher than the 12% observed for parents living with a partner. Similarly, among those without children, the poverty rate for single individuals was 19%, while for couples, it was notably lower at only 7%. This emphasizes the impact of family composition on the likelihood of living below the poverty line.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 6

The table provides some statistics relating to the percentage of different family types in Australia who were living below the poverty line in 1999

Families with children and people living alone had higher rates of poverty, while the elderly and couple without children were less likely to be living in poverty

In 1999, the group with the highest proportion of poverty was that of single-parent families, which had a poverty level of 21%. Single people with no children also had high levels of poverty at 19%, while about one-eighth of couples with children were existing in poverty.”

On the other hand, only 4% of elderly couples were living in poverty, while the proportion of aged singles was slightly higher at 6%. Finally, couples with no children were only about half as likely to be living in poverty than couples who did have children.

Overall, it seems that having children causes a significant amount of financial pressure, while older people seem to be more financially comfortable.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 7

The table gives a breakdown of the different type of family who were living in poverty in Australia in 1999.

On average, 11% of all households, comprising almost two million people, were in this position. However, those consisting of only one parent or a single adult had almost doubted this proportion of poor people, with 21% and 19% respectively.

Couples generally tended to be better off, with lower poverty levels for couples without children (7%) than those with children (12%). It is noticeable that for both types of households with children, a higher-than-average proportion were living in poverty at this time.

Older people were generally less likely to be poor, though once again the trend favoured eldery couples (only 4%) rather than single eldery people (6%).

Overall, the table suggests that households of single adults and those with children were more likely to be living in poverty than those consisting of couples.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 8

The presented table lists the proportion of poverty-stricken families on various types of Australian households in 1999. In general, most of the families who lived alone in 1999 suffered from poverty compared to most families who lived with the couple.

Looking at the detail, ‘sole parent’, ‘single with no children’ and ‘couples with children’ were listed as the high majority of proportion for family type among the Australian households living in poverty. They accounted for 21%, 19%, and 12% respectively in 1999.

On the other hand, ‘aged couple’, ‘single-aged person’, and ‘couple with no children’ were true as having a low proportion of family type experiencing poverty in Australia in this year. Aged couples were about a fifth, 4%, of the proportion of sole parents. Meanwhile, the proportion of single-aged person and couple with no children was about a third lower, 6% and 7% respectively, than sole parent which accounted for the highest proportion of family types among all Australian households living in poverty.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 9

The supplied table data presents the ration of poor families in Australia in the year 1999. As can be clearly seen from the given table data, 11% Australian family lived in poverty in 1999 and parents with children made the highest number of destitute families which was 933,000.

As is given in the table, 6% of aged people who were single lived in poverty in 1999. This proportion for the aged couple was 4%. Again, 19% of singles with no children lived in poverty this year and their total number was 359,000 compared to only 7% couple with no children. Furthermore, sole parents who were poor in this year were 232,000 in number and their poverty ratio was 21%. Finally, 12% couple with children lived in the destitute situation in 1999 in Australia and their percentage was 12% and their total number was 933,000. This type of family had the largest number of poverty-stricken families though their percentage was lower than that of sole parents and singles with no children.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 10

The given table presents data regarding the poor families of different types in Australia for the year 1999. As is observed from the information, 11% of all households lived in poverty in 1999 in Australia and among them, sole parents and single people with no child were the highest in percentages that lived in hardship.

According to the given data, more than 1.8 million families in Australia lived in hardship in 1999 that formed 11% of the total households. Among them, around 50 thousand poor families came from the single-aged person and aged couple type families who formed 6% and 4% of the total of that family types. Sole parents and single persons without children formed the largest percentage of poor families and their percentages were consecutively 21% and 19% of their family types. The highest percentage of poor families was from sole parents and the highest number of needy families was from couples with children type. Comparatively, couples with no child had less poverty percentage than the single with no children family types.

In conclusion, the family type with aged people suffered less from poverty than the sole parents and single persons with no child.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 11

The table gives information about poverty rates among six types of households in Australia in the year 1999.

It is noticeable that levels of poverty were higher for single people than for couples, and people with children were more likely to be poor than those without. Poverty rates were considerably lower among elderly people.

Overall, 11% of Australians, or 1,837,000 people, were living in poverty in 1999. Aged people were the least likely to be poor, with poverty levels of 6% and 4% for single-aged people and aged couples respectively.

Just over one fifth of single parents were living in poverty, whereas only 12% of parents living with a partner were classed as poor. The same pattern can be seen for people with no children: while 19% of single people in this group were living below the poverty line, the figure for couples was much lower, at only 7%.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 12

The table data shows the different categories of poor Australian people in 1999, as well as the figures for impoverished families in the same year.

It can be seen that poverty was more prevalent among singles with or without children in Australia, compared to other family types.

In 1999, more than 1.83 million Australian families were poor, accounting for just over one-tenth of all households in the country. According to the data, one out of every five solitary parents in Australia was poor in 1999, the highest percentage of poverty among the various family forms. Couples with children, however, made up the majority of disadvantaged families, accounting for about one million homes. 211,000 couples without children, on the other hand, made up a relatively high proportion, at 7% of the population.

19% of single Australians without any child were needy, at 19%, while this rate among the elder citizens was much fewer – 6% single ages person and 4% aged couple were living in poverty and the total number of such families were 54,000 and 48,000 respectively.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 13

The table shows a breakdown of different types of families who were living in poverty in Australia in 1999.

It is noticeable that 11% of people were living in poverty. However, this figure was considerably high among the sole parents and single people who did not have children, and those percentages were 21% and 19% respectively. Moreover, this proportion was significantly prominent among couples who had children compared with the family structures consisting with couples who did not have children. In fact, the proportion of couples with children living in poverty was 5% more than that in the family types consisted only with couples. In contrast, this trend favoured aged people. However, this figure was slightly more (2%) among the single-aged people than that in the family category of aged couples.

In conclusion, it is clear that the proportion of people living in poverty varied according to their family structures.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 14

The table presents data pertaining to the different types of families residing in a state of poverty within the Australian context during the year 1999.

Initially, it is noteworthy that approximately 6 percent of older adults who live alone experienced hardship, a figure that exceeded the poverty rate for elderly couples by 2 percent. The proportion of persons without children was found to be 19 percent, but childless couples constituted 7 percent of the total population.

It is worth noting that the poverty rate among single parents was almost 21 percent, a figure that exceeded the percentage of couples with children living in poverty, which stood at 12 percent. According to the census data, approximately 11% of the population resided in households.

In summary, it is clear that a sizeable percentage of people who were living in poverty were single parents, whereas a smaller percentage of people who were living in poverty were elderly people.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 15

The table illustrates the percentage and number of people from various family types who were living in poverty in Australia in the year 1999. The data is presented in descending order of the percentage of people in poverty.

It is clear that sole parent families were the most affected by poverty, with 21% of them, or 933,000 individuals, living below the poverty line. This was followed by single people without children, who accounted for 19% of the poor population, or 359,000 people.

On the other hand, aged couples were the least likely to experience poverty, with only 4% of them, or 48,000 individuals, living in impoverished conditions. Single-aged persons and couples without children had similar percentages of people in poverty, at 6% and 7% respectively, but the latter group had a much larger number of people in poverty, at 211,000 compared to 54,000.

Families with children had a slightly higher percentage of people in poverty than the average of all households, which was 11%. They represented 12% of the poor population, or 933,000 individuals.

Overall, the table shows that family type had a significant impact on the likelihood of living in poverty in Australia in 1999, with sole parent families and single people without children being the most vulnerable groups.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 16

The table compares the proportion and number of people from different family types who lived in poverty in Australia in 1999. The data is arranged from the highest to the lowest percentage of people in poverty.

The most striking feature of the table is that sole parent families had the highest percentage of people in poverty, at 21%, which amounted to 933,000 individuals. They were followed by single people without children, who made up 19% of the poor population, or 359,000 people.

In contrast, aged couples had the lowest percentage of people in poverty, at only 4%, which corresponded to 48,000 individuals. Single-aged persons and couples without children had similar proportions of people in poverty, at 6% and 7% respectively, but the former group had a much smaller number of people in poverty, at 54,000 compared to 211,000.

Families with children had a slightly higher proportion of people in poverty than the average of all households, which was 11%. They constituted 12% of the poor population, or 933,000 individuals.

In summary, the table reveals that family type had a considerable influence on the risk of living in poverty in Australia in 1999, with sole parent families and single people without children being the most disadvantaged groups.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 17

The table compares six different types of families in Australia in terms of the percentage of those living in poverty in 1999.

Overall, it is clear that single-parent families and those with large households had the highest proportion of poverty. In contrast, elderly couples and childless couples experienced the lowest levels of poverty.

In 1999, around 21% of single-parent families were classified as poor, making them the most impoverished family type. Similarly, families with children, particularly those with four or more children, had a poverty rate of 12.7%, while couples with children had a slightly lower poverty rate of 7.6%.

On the other hand, elderly couples had the lowest poverty rate, with only 4% of them falling into the category of impoverished families. The second lowest group was childless couples, with just 6% living in poverty.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 18

The table delineates the percentages and corresponding headcounts of varied family constructs grappling with economic hardship within Australia during the year 1999.

An overarching observation of the data reveals that a substantial segment of Australian families, exceeding 1.83 million, were ensnared in the throes of impoverishment, with particular family types being more susceptible than others. Notably, families without the buffer of children, whether single or aged couples, exhibited relative financial resilience compared to those with dependent offspring.

Delving into the specifics, the demographic of sole parents emerged as the most afflicted, with 21% (232,000 individuals) living in poverty. Similarly, single individuals devoid of offspring represented a significant portion of this socio-economic challenge, with 19% (359,000 individuals) facing penury. Moreover, families comprising both parents and children constituted 12% (933,000 individuals) of the poverty-stricken populace, marking them as the family type with the highest absolute number languishing in poverty.

Conversely, the data illustrates a contrasting financial stability among aged couples and single-aged persons, who are reported at 4% (48,000 individuals) and 6% (54,000 individuals) respectively. In an interesting comparison within dual-adult households, those devoid of children portrayed a better economic stance, at 7% (211,000 individuals), as opposed to their child-rearing counterparts.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 19

The provided table delineates the different categories of families living in poverty in Australia for the year 1999, detailing both percentages and absolute figures.

A cursory examination reveals that a significant section, over one in ten households, found themselves grappling with poverty. Predominantly affected were families with children and single individuals without offspring.

Delving into specifics, elderly Australians appeared to be the least impacted, with only 6% of single-aged persons and a mere 4% of aged couples experiencing economic hardship. In stark contrast, the data illustrates that 19% of single individuals with no children, totaling upwards of 359,000, were not as financially secure. Couples without children were better off, with only 7% living in penury.

However, the plight of sole parents was particularly acute, as they constituted the highest proportion of poverty at 21%, amounting to 232,000 individuals. Conclusively, families consisting of couples with children represented the largest numerical group living in destitution, with 933,000 such households, or 12%, falling below the poverty line.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 20

The provided table delineates the percentages and absolute figures pertaining to various family constructs subsisting in indigence within Australia for the year 1999.

An overview of the data indicates that poverty afflicted over 1.8 million households, encapsulating roughly 11% of all familial units in Australia. Notably, single, no children households, and sole parents represented the categories most burdened by impoverishment.

Delving into specifics, sole parents emerged as the group most disproportionately impacted, with 21% living in poverty, translating to 232,000 households. Conversely, aged couples were the least affected, with only 4% or 48,000 households experiencing financial hardship. Singles without children also faced significant challenges, with 19% or 359,000 households in poverty. Meanwhile, couples with children constituted the largest number in absolute terms, with 933,000 households, or 12%, living below the poverty line.

Moreover, the data showcases that single-aged persons and couples without children experienced poverty at rates of 6% (54,000 households) and 7% (211,000 households) respectively.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 21

The provided table delineates the proportions of different categories of families living in poverty within Australia during the year 1999.

An overarching review of the data indicates that one in ten Australian households encountered financial hardship, with sole parents and childless singles being particularly susceptible to impoverished conditions.

Delving into the specifics, sole parents represented the highest percentage within their group at 21%, which translates to 232,000 households grappling with poverty. This was closely followed by singles without children, who accounted for 19% or 359,000 of their category. These figures starkly contrast with the relatively lower percentages of impoverished aged couples and couples without children, at a mere 4% and 7% respectively.

Moreover, while couples with children constituted 12% of their category living in poverty, they represented the most substantial number in terms of absolute figures, amounting to 933,000 households. This juxtaposition between percentages and actual numbers highlights the nuanced nature of economic hardship across different family types.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 22

As from the upper table information, prevailing a view on different categories of families on poverty in Australia during theyear1999. There was a lot of families type in Australia suffering from the poverty problem in year 1999.

It can be observed that single elderly individuals comprise only six percent of the total. The family type with the lowest poverty rate is aged couples, accounting for up to 48000 individuals. Conversely, the proportion of households living in poverty with childless couples is 19% (approximately 359,000 people).

Shifting the focus to the next family category, sole parents have the highest representation, constituting 21% of all households. Furthermore, couples living with their children amount to 933,000 individuals. Lastly, the combined total of all households in poverty stands at 11% (equivalent to 1,837,000).

In conclusion, the family type with the highest poverty rate is sole parents, whereas aged couples represent the lowest proportion of households living in poverty.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 23

The table presents data on poverty rates among six types of households in Australia in 1999.

It is evident that single individuals experienced higher poverty rates compared to couples, and households with children were more vulnerable to poverty than those without. Elderly individuals had notably lower poverty rates.

In summary, 11% of Australians, totaling 1,837,000 individuals, lived in poverty in 1999. Elderly individuals had the lowest poverty rates, with 6% and 4% for single elderly and elderly couples respectively.

Slightly more than one fifth of single parents experienced poverty, whereas only 12% of partnered parents were categorized as poor. A similar trend is evident among individuals without children: while 19% of singles in this group lived below the poverty line, the percentage for couples was significantly lower, at 7%.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia - mẫu 24

The table illustrates the percentage of families in Australia living in poverty in 1999, categorized by family type. The families are classified into five groups: single elderly, single parent, couple with dependent children, couple without dependent children, and other families.

In 1999, the highest proportion of families in poverty was observed among single-parent households, constituting 36.8% of the total. Single-parent families faced a significantly higher poverty rate compared to other family types. Couples with dependent children and single elderly families also experienced notable poverty levels, accounting for 21.2% and 20.9%, respectively.

Conversely, couples without dependent children and other families had relatively lower poverty rates, standing at 14.4% and 6.7%, respectively. Among these categories, other families exhibited the lowest incidence of poverty. This suggests that families without children or falling into the “other” category were less vulnerable to economic hardship in 1999.

In summary, the data from 1999 indicates that single-parent households faced the highest risk of poverty in Australia, while families without dependent children or falling into the “other” category exhibited lower rates of poverty. The findings underscore the need for targeted policies to address the economic challenges faced by specific family structures.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

• The diagram shows how tea leaves are processed into five tea types. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

• The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

• The graphs below show how people in a European city reached their office and got back home in 1959 and 2009. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

• The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

---