Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of

Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Đề bài: Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of - mẫu 1

It has been observed that a large amount of time and funding has been allocated towards wildlife protection. However, some argue that this funding could be put to better use towards helping humanity. In this essay, I will explain my thoughts as to why I partially agree that time and money could be better spent on helping humanity.

On the one hand, the protection of wild animals can maintain the delicate balance of the ecosystem. If one animal species becomes completely extinct, other species may suffer from a lack of food as this prey may be their sole food source and then consequently become extinct themselves, massively disrupting the food chain. Hence the protection of wild animals cannot be understated and requires adequate funding and time for it to continue in the long term. This can be observed in the US, where the Conservation Reserve Program assisted in increasing the population of native bird species such as ducks, grouse and pheasants, owing to the abundant amount of money and time dedicated by the government to supporting this program.

On the other hand, there are more important sectors to allocate funding to in order to facilitate human development. While the protection of wild animals may not have a direct effect on supporting humanity, there are other facets of human society that do, such as infrastructure, healthcare and education. By devoting enough money and time to bolstering these sectors, there can be marked improvements in the quality of life for the human population. Venezuela for instance, is currently facing a financial crisis that started in 2013 which has led to the country struggling to improve the quality of life for its citizens. Thus, they have to prioritise meeting their citizens’ basic needs before devoting funding to protecting native wildlife.

In conclusion, I somewhat believe that though an investment in preserving animals may somehow maintain the balance of the ecosystem, our time and money should be more justifiably spent on important sectors of the economy to improve people’s living standards.

Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of - mẫu 2

It is true that wildlife has suffered as a result of the economic success that people have experienced recently. As a result, people’s interest in the conservation of wild animals has always grown. Some believe, however, that the time and money devoted to this noble endeavour are almost excessive and that they need to be used instead on initiatives that directly assist the human race. Although there is some merit to this way of thinking, I believe that more work should be done by humans to safeguard wild animals.

Firstly, wildlife plays an important role in maintaining ecological balance, pollinating crops, and preventing the spread of diseases. Ignoring their protection may lead to unforeseen consequences, affecting human well-being in the long run. Secondly, tourism, which often revolves around wildlife, contributes significantly to economies. By investing in the protection of wild animals and their habitats, countries can attract tourists.

However, it is essential to acknowledge the importance of finding a balance. Some conservation efforts might seem extravagant, and redirecting a portion of those funds towards immediate human necessities could be beneficial. Governments and organizations should prioritize projects that address both wildlife protection and human welfare, ensuring a harmonious coexistence.

In conclusion, while there may be instances where funds for wildlife protection seem excessive, a comprehensive approach is necessary. Striking a balance between preserving our natural heritage and meeting human needs is key to building a sustainable and equitable future for both species. 

Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of - mẫu 3

While there is so much human suffering, the spending of resources to protect wild animals presents an ethical dilemma. However, I disagree with the opinion given, because it is possible to allocate resources intelligently to benefit both the animal and the human population.

The protection of wild animals must be high on the agenda of every individual citizen and government. Firstly, the red list of endangered species is increasing every year. If wildlife extinction continues, then humans may face an ecological crisis which impacts on their own survival. For example, if the practice of whaling is not halted, the ecosystems of our oceans will be altered forever, and this may affect fish stocks on which so many communities depend for a living. Secondly, protecting wild animals means protecting the habitats in which they live, such as rainforests and wetlands. If habitat destruction is permitted, climate change will affect our capacity to produce food to sustain the growing human population.

The formation of wildlife reserves not only protects wildlife, it also brings benefits to communities. In order to generate revenue for their management and to eliminate poaching, responsible ecotourism to observe animals in the wild can be developed further. This has been shown to create jobs in such places as the Serengeti National Park in Africa. The result is increased prosperity when local communities, especially in developing countries, are involved in the running of wildlife safaris, which attract visitors to the reserves. Thus, the application of intelligent strategies brings benefits for humans and wildlife.

In conclusion, I disagree with the view expressed in the statement. It is in the interest of everyone to protect wildlife, and creative solutions have shown that this need not be a drain on scarce resources. 

Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of - mẫu 4

There are those who opine that the immense amount of attention and money that are being spent for wildlife conservation should be allocated to the human population. I totally disagree with this idea because of the advantages provided by animals, humans’ responsibility to solve the environmental impacts, and biodiversity preservation.

First of all, I believe that we should protect animals because of the benefits that they bring to us. For example, lambs have provided food and clothing for humans for centuries, while mice are used for medical experiments such as finding vaccines against deadly diseases such as HIV. Therefore, it is worthwhile to spend money for animal conservation in order to keep the benefits continuing. In addition, it is humans’ responsibility to ease the environmental problems caused by their activities. This is because the natural habitats of wild animals such as forests are being exploited to serve the exponential growth of human population, thereby putting many of them on the verge of extinction.

Another point is that animal species need to be protected in order to maintain biodiversity. This is because without this biodiversity the whole planet suffers threats including people. For instance, rain forests and animals depend upon each other as mutual interdependence is a must for their survival. The forests provide shelter for animals, and they make oxygen for the animals to live. When animals die, they decompose and become natural fertilizer for plants in the forests. Therefore, the disappearance of animals can pose a risk to rain forests which are crucial for human survival as they produce oxygen and prevent the threat of climate change.

In conclusion, I believe that wildlife conservation is imperative to be allocated considerable resources to because this can maintain the benefits of animal species to humans, solve environmental problems resulting from people’s activities and prevent the biodiversity from being destroyed.

Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of - mẫu 5

It is argued that plenty of time and money has been invested in order to preserve wild animals, and that these funds could be more effectively allocated to helping people instead. Personally, I totally agree with the first half of the statement but disapprove of the second. In this essay, I will elaborate upon the reasons.

Granted, a large amount of time and money has been given to the protection of wildlife because in many countries, wildlife reserves have so far been planned and constructed, and strict regulations have been implemented, baring people from hunting illegally. Moreover, the media has reports to increase the public awareness of protecting wild animals and encourage them to actively participate in related activities. As a result, the number of certain endangered species has been increasing gradually over the past few years.

However, it is never wise to transfer the money spent on wildlife protection to the human population because there are still many other species in danger, whose habitats have been destroyed and the number of which is plummeting due to innumerous human activities, such as deforestation, reclamation and hunting. Thus, if insufficient or a complete lack of effort is made, these animals may face extinction. This can result in damage to the ecosystem, and ultimately having adverse influences on human beings. 

Meanwhile, the human population has already been effectively funded and does not need more money. It is easy to see that ample infrastructure has been built, including roads, hospitals and parks, so people find it easy to live their lives. Also, many art galleries, theatres and museums have been constructed; thus, people can spend their leisure time and enjoy their lives. 

In conclusion, I agree with the viewpoint that a great amount of time and money has been spent conserving wild animals but disagree that the human population still requires more money. I suggest that money be allocated wisely to allow sustainable development, which eventually benefits the human beings as a whole. 

Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of - mẫu 6

There can be little doubt that in recent decades a lot of time and money has been spent on protecting wild animals. Although spending on protecting these kinds of wild animals can sometimes be beneficial to humans, I would argue that it is of higher importance to allocate these resources to the human population. 

On the one hand, it is reasonable to provide financial support for wildlife protection. In fact, by saving wild animals, humans are saving themselves. Wild animals, for instance, may hold the keys to certain medical breakthroughs, just as many modern medicines are based on compounds found in plants. Moreover, humans, animals and other forms of life all form a giant ecosystem whereby each part can influence the others. If a certain animal becomes less common, this, in turn, will reduce the population of the animals that prey on it, which is more likely to disrupt the ecological balance and eventually threatens the survival of human society.

However, it is sometimes difficult for people to accept that these perfectly legitimate reasons outweigh the immediate requirements of the human population. If money is not available to people who have problems such as mental illness, physical disabilities or to those living in dire poverty, it is inevitable that some will suggest spending less on wild animals. There is a strong argument that by spending more on the education of humans, we could make the world a better place for us and for wild animals. 

Overall, I tend to agree with those who claim that too much money is currently being spent on wild animals at the cost of humans. This is not to suggest that we cut all funding for wildlife projects since many of these projects can directly benefit humans. However, a key argument for me is that by spending money on people, we can improve the world generally. 

Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of - mẫu 7

There are many who doubt the logic of spending money and time on wild animals when there are so many humans in need. In my opinion, the valid reasons to prioritise humanity do not outweigh the fact that animals more desperately require refuge.

Those who advocate for less aid for animals believe that human life is inherently more valuable. Humans are capable of higher reasoning skills, have more emotionally complex lives, and most importantly, we share a primary obligation to members of our own species. A good example of this would be when humans and animals come into conflict. Recently, a boy fell into a gorilla cage at a zoo and the wild animal was killed to protect the child. There was a large public outcry but only extremists would argue the human should die in such situations. Increased funding for wildlife in effect means reduced resources allocated to charities for the underprivileged and the implicit elevation of animals over humans.

However, the risk to wild animals is pressing and justifies responsible action. Despite the vulnerability of particular humans, nothing imperils humanity as a whole. This is not the case for endangered animals like bald eagles, cheetahs, lions, and polar bears. They face threats ranging from the impact of climate change to deforestation to poaching. Those are all a direct result of human activity. Without our help, there is a very real chance that some species on the brink will go extinct in the coming decades. Once they have gone extinct, there will be no way to bring them back and this is the existential threat that ought to compel continued funding for programs aimed at wildlife conservation.

In conclusion, though human life is more valuable, the danger looming for at-risk animals is greater and validates compassionate effort. The longer we neglect animals, the greater the chances of extinction.

Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of - mẫu 8

There are some debates over whether money that is spent on wildlife protection could be better spent on helping people. Personally, I believe that the protection of wild animals is extremely important and that countries need to invest more money in preserving their native animal species.

Firstly, I do not believe that much time or money is actually spent on protecting wild animals. In addition, I believe that a large majority of time that people spend on such issues is voluntary work that people do because they are passionate about saving and helping animals. Additionally, a large amount of money that is spent on these causes is from charity organizations which rely mostly on donations. Therefore, we cannot tell people what charities that they should or should not donate their time and money towards.

Secondly, while many people believe that humans are the superior race on planet Earth, others, including myself, feel that all living beings, human and animal, have equal rights to live in peace, and therefore the protection of all animals and their habitats is extremely important. Human activity is no doubt the main cause of most problems wild animals face. The human race has continued to destroy the planet and the natural habitats of wild animals and therefore should be responsible for protecting them so that they can live wild and free, as is their natural state.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that it is essential for the health of the planet to maintain a diverse range of animals and wildlife within all eco-systems. I also believe that due to the widespread devastation humans have caused to the natural environment, it is our responsibility to do whatever necessary, regardless of time and money, in order to restore a healthy balance to the planet’s natural environments.

Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of - mẫu 9

The debate over whether resources spent on the protection of wild animals should be redirected to address human needs is contentious. While some argue that funds and efforts could be better utilized for the human population, I firmly believe that conserving wild animals is essential.

Wildlife plays a crucial role in maintaining ecological balance, which directly impacts human well-being. For instance, pollination by bees and other insects is vital for food production. Additionally, wild animals serve as indicators of environmental health, signaling threats like pollution or habitat loss. The decline of bat populations, for example, has led to increased crop damage due to insect pests, underscoring the interconnectedness of ecosystems and human interests.

Furthermore, the economic benefits of wildlife conservation, particularly through ecotourism, are significant. Countries like Costa Rica have demonstrated how protecting natural habitats can create thriving tourism industries, providing revenue and employment for local communities. Thus, investing in wildlife conservation can contribute to economic prosperity.

However, it is important to balance conservation efforts with human development needs. Some conservation initiatives can be costly, and it is reasonable to allocate a portion of these funds to immediate human concerns such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure. Integrating conservation with community development can create synergies that benefit both wildlife and people. For instance, community-managed natural resources can simultaneously protect wildlife and improve livelihoods.

In conclusion, while it is understandable to question the allocation of resources for wildlife conservation, the benefits of protecting wild animals are profound and multifaceted. A balanced approach that addresses both conservation and human development is essential for a sustainable future. By investing in conservation, supporting ecotourism, and integrating community development with environmental protection, we can ensure the well-being of both wildlife and human populations.

Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of - mẫu 10

Protecting wild animals is an everyday activity across the globe. People have different opinions on spending lots of time and money on these pursuits. Some argue that the money should be spent on human activities. I believe that efforts to ensure the preservation of wild animals are essential for humans.

First and foremost, wild animals play an essential role in maintaining the balance of biodiversity and ecological balance. Since the dawn of time, animals have been key players in the food chain sustaining Earth’s existence. For example, when predators such as tigers and lions disappear, it increases the population of prey animals such as rabbits, deer and others, which could cause natural disasters such as food shortages and famine. The reason behind this is that the former plays a vital role as hunters by stimulating the ability of prey species in the wild.

Regarding medical issues, it is evident that humans benefit from animals that roam the wild, as some essential chemical elements found in these animals are used in medical studies to help produce medicine. They can help patients deal with different types of illnesses, such as cancer and Alzheimer’s. Additionally, research has shown that animals’ immune systems can help prevent certain kinds of diseases that humans are unable to. Therefore, by studying these animals’ genes, researchers may discover ways to stop these in addition to epidemics and cancers.

In conclusion, there are many reasons to protect wild animals. I believe that humans can reap enormous advantages from these activities.

Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of - mẫu 11

Resources, both tangible and intangible, have constantly aided the development of the living world despite being limited in amount. In fact, while some may argue that priority should be given to the human population, I do believe that those resources should be allocated to protecting wildlife instead.

On the one hand, it is thought that investing in the human populace is more crucial than wildlife preservation because of how it may push civilization to further extents. Take education, one of the pillars in the development of a country, as an example. A knock-on effect can be easily observed if the government diverts more money to this domain. This is probably because the higher the number of people receiving proper education is, the more skillful the workforce in professional fields such as medicine and engineering may become. Hence, there will be a continuous flow of qualified workers who would be better at resolving global issues or even expanding the boundary of space exploration. Simply put, the allocation of money and time to human-related fields is expected to pave the way for maximizing human potential.

Despite those possible benefits, I side with those who think that the protection of wild animals deserves more subsidies from the state. Although I concede the prospective opportunities from a huge, experienced workforce, it is important to notice the detrimental effects industrial development has on the environment, such as global warming. In contrast, focusing on animal protection will not only exert no adverse impact on nature but also help mitigate some environmental problems since it prevents biodiversity loss. More importantly, there is a close relationship between animals and the human’s living environment, which means that protecting these species is equivalent to providing a safe shelter for human beings. Funding reforestation campaigns, for instance, will reintroduce a considerable number of species, allowing a sustainable ecosystem to combat climate change. I, therefore, believe the resources distributed to animal protection are more vital.

In conclusion, although government fundings could enable an array of opportunities for human society, the utmost importance of wildlife protection is unassailable as failure to act may threaten humankind. Therefore, on balance, I believe animal protection should be prioritized over human development when it comes to resources.

Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of - mẫu 12

Nowadays, it has become common practice to protect wild animals around the world. People have conflicting opinions about investing a lot of money and time in those activities. While some claim that money should be spent on human life, I would argue that those efforts are very necessary for people to conserve wild animals.

First and foremost, wild animals play a vital role in maintaining ecological balance and biodiversity. Millions of years ago, these animals have been they key parts in the food chains that supported life on Earth. For instance, if predators such as lions and tigers disappear, this will lead to the death of prey such as deer, rabbits, and so on. The reason for this is that the former, as hunters, play an important role in stimulating the latter's ability to survive in the wild environment.

In the medical field, it is undeniable that human benefit greatly from wild animals. It can be seen that valuable chemical elements have been used in medical experiments in animals that contribute significantly to the production of medicine. They can help people cope with a variety of diseases, such as cancer or Alzheimer's. In addition, studies show that the immune systems of some wild animals can prevent certain types of diseases that humans cannot cope with. Thus, by studying the genes of these animals, scientists could find methods to contain diseases such as cancer and epidemics.

To conclude, there are important reasons why we should protect wild animals. I believe that a person will greatly benefit from those activities.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion?

• For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• It is believed that people who read for pleasure develop their imagination more and acquire better language skills compared to people who prefer watching a television. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

---