In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education

In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Đề bài: In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education - mẫu 1

In countries plagued by high unemployment rates, it might seem counterintuitive to provide education beyond the primary level to the majority of students. Although this line of thinking appears reasonable at first glance, I argue that it is an overly simplified view, and I wholeheartedly disagree with the stance.

Firstly, accurately forecasting fluctuations in the job market is an immensely challenging task. There may be times when there is a high demand for employees across various sectors of a country's economy, resulting in elevated wages and the need for the education system to equip numerous students with the skills required by employers up to and beyond secondary school level. For instance, while technology is replacing many conventional jobs in sectors such as agriculture, transportation, and heavy industry, it is simultaneously generating new employment opportunities in other areas. Consequently, it is virtually impossible to determine the exact number of highly educated young individuals that a nation's workforce will require.

Secondly, I maintain that the purpose of education extends far beyond simply preparing young people for the labor market. Education is fundamentally about acquiring lifelong skills to critically evaluate all aspects of life. When executed effectively, secondary education serves a crucial role in assisting young individuals in developing these critical thinking abilities. If a country's population is knowledgeable and enlightened, issues such as welfare systems or wealth distribution can be intelligently discussed. Without widespread education at this level, a nation cannot have conscientious citizens.

In conclusion, while the employment landscape of any country is susceptible to rapid shifts in today's unpredictable global economy, the intangible yet crucial objectives of education necessitate that young people should receive an education up to at least the secondary level.

In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education - mẫu 2

Some people believe that those who live in nations with high unemployment rates do not need secondary education since they have a low probability of obtaining work. I disagree that secondary school has a lot of positive outcomes that can help lower this percentage.

To begin with, one of the world's problems for which no solution has yet been identified is unemployment. I believe that education is the most important factor in obtaining a job. We are not currently teaching specializations in primary education. Furthermore, the subject is primarily made up of broad knowledge. It suggests that their expertise isn't suitable for a clear working environment. Secondary education is critical in this scenario since students who have completed secondary education have accumulated specific information such as opportunities, prospects, working processes, and so on. They have already earned the necessary experience for a career in university training. In other words, employers want to find experts with extensive knowledge.

Secondly, the rate of unemployment can continue to rise indefinitely. If they have a secondary education, their unemployment rate may decrease. They should concentrate on bringing together those who have achieved success in their life in this scenario. As a result, they should share their life experiences with primary school students. In the life of young people, this might contribute to a sense of motivation. Furthermore, these skilled individuals can obtain a bank loan and begin their own firm. They will be able to generate employment for the citizens, which is quite important. Even if it isn't going to be easy.

To summarise, unemployment is an issue for which no remedy has been found because the problem is clearly linked to a lack of knowledge.

In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education - mẫu 3

In most countries, as the world's population expands, so do unemployment rates. As a result, many people believe that education beyond primary school is unnecessary. No one agrees that education beyond primary school is no longer necessary, regardless of how high or low unemployment rates are. This will be demonstrated by examining the sophistication that higher education offers, as well as how education aids in the differentiation of more productive and less productive individuals.

To begin with, the benefits of education beyond primary school do not stop with the technical knowledge received from studies; they also include the courtesies and etiquette learned by pupils as they age. Bullying among youngsters, for example, is well-known to peak in high school, after which it begins to decline as kids grow more aware of wrongs and rights. Bullies may become juvenile delinquents if children begin to drop out of school after the basic level. After considering this, it is evident that education beyond the primary level is beneficial to the society as a whole. Furthermore, without education, prospective employers would have a tougher time deciding between people who are more competent and those who are less capable. This idea is illustrated well by a scenario in which all job candidates for a certain job are just high school graduates. Employers would have a difficult time selecting the best candidate for the job. Unfortunately, if there are no criteria for deciding amongst possible employees, the hiring process will be ineffective. As a result, knowledge above the primary school level is crucial in the employment process.

In conclusion, higher education has an important role in humanising adolescents and discriminating between talented and unskilled workers. As a result, I disagree with the notion that education beyond the primary level is unnecessary. Regardless of unemployment levels, it is desired that people will continue to gain knowledge through education.

In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education - mẫu 4

Many people nowadays claim that primary school students who are deemed unemployed in the future should not be provided secondary schooling in nations with high unemployment rates. This is a point of view with which I fully disagree for various reasons.

To begin with, it is apparent that forecasting job market upturns and downturns is tough. There may be a demand for workers in numerous sectors of a country's economy at any given time. As a result, the educational system must train a significant number of students from primary school through secondary school to satisfy the needs of businesses. While technology is displacing many conventional employments in areas like agriculture and transportation, it is also offering a wide range of career opportunities in other industries. As a result, estimating how many highly educated young people will be required for the nation's economy is impossible.

Furthermore, secondary education is important in developing young people's soft skills. For example, students in secondary school are expected to work on group assignments or presentations in which they must coordinate ideas and manage a team. As a result, they will be able to gain insights into team spirit as well as develop teamwork and communication abilities. As a result, students who were once thought to have no chance of obtaining work can now have a better chance of finding work.

Finally, for the reasons stated above, I completely disagree with the viewpoint that it is superfluous for the government to provide secondary education to primary school students who are unlikely to find work in the future.

In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education - mẫu 5

It is argued that in nations where the level of unemployment is high, providing secondary education for students is pointless since it is virtually impossible for them to have a job in the future. I strongly disagree with this point of view.

Offering only primary education to pupils is a short-sighted view for several reasons. First of all, it would be extremely tough for pupils to find a job when they do not have any qualifications. If they are fortunate enough to have a job, it is likely to be the one that will give them a meager income. As a result, they may find it hard to support themselves, and in turn become a burden to society. Furthermore, if students are provided with only primary education, there will be a lack of numerous professions. For example, there will be no doctors, teachers or architects when students are not allowed to pursue higher education.

There are many other reasons why secondary or even tertiary education should be provided. The primary reason is that students will have the chance to absorb more knowledge necessary for their career. Being well equipped with relevant understanding and skills in their chosen field, students will stand a higher chance of having better employment prospects. In addition, when people are well educated, they can create their own opportunities. For example, students who study finance or business can open their own enterprise in the future. As a result, they are able to create more jobs for other people, which can lead to the unemployment rate being reduced.

In conclusion, I would argue that giving only primary education to pupils is not a wise decision, and that providing secondary education is of paramount importance since it can assist young people in having a decent job in the future.

In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education - mẫu 6

It is true that in countries that suffer from high unemployment rates, it seems hardly worthwhile to offer education beyond primary level to most pupils. While I accept that this appears logical, I believe that this is a very narrow perspective, and I completely disagree with the statement.

Firstly, predicting upturns and downturns in the job market is extremely difficult. At one period there may be a demand for workers in many sectors of a country’s economy. Wages are high, and the education system needs to prepare large numbers of students up to and beyond secondary school level, with the skills to meet the needs of employers. For example, while technology is replacing many traditional jobs in such areas as agriculture, transport and heavy industry, it is also creating new jobs in other sectors. Thus, in economic terms, it is almost impossible to say how many highly educated young people will be required for a nation’s workforce.

Secondly, I contend that the purpose of education is much more fundamental than simply to prepare young people for the world of work. Education is nothing less than the acquisition of lifelong skills in thinking critically about all aspects of life. At its best, secondary education plays an essential part of helping young people to develop these critical skills. If the citizens of a country are informed and enlightened, problems such as a welfare system or the distribution of wealth can be intelligently debated. Without mass education to this level, a country can have no responsible citizens.

In conclusion, although in today’s volatile global economy, any country’s employment situation is subject to rapid changes, the intangible but real objectives of education dictate that young people should be educated to at least secondary level.

In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education - mẫu 7

As the world’s population grows so does the unemployment rates in most countries. This leads many people to avow that education beyond primary school level is not needed. It is disagreed that education beyond primary school level is no longer needed, no matter how high or low the unemployment rates get. This will be proven by looking at the sophistication that higher education brings with it and how education helps to differentiate between the more productive and less productive people.

To begin, the merits of education beyond primary school level are not limited to the technical knowledge gained from the studies, they extend to the courtesies and etiquettes learned by students as they get more mature through education. For instance, it is no secret that bullying amongst children is highest up until high school, it starts to diminish from thereon as students become more in-tune to the wrongs and rights. If youngsters, start to drop out of school after primary level, those bullies, could go on to become juvenile delinquents. After analysing this, it is clear that education beyond primary level is indeed fruitful for the society at large.

Furthermore, in absence of education, it would be harder for prospective employers to choose between more competent and less competent people. A scenario where all job applicants for a particular job are primary school level qualified, employers would be hard pressed to select the best possible candidate for the said job, illustrates this point well. Unfortunately, if there are no criteria, upon which to decide between potential employees, the recruitment process will become inept. Hence, education beyond primary school level plays a pivotal role in hiring process.

In summary, higher education has a significant part to play in humanising the youth, and in distinguishing between the skilled and the unskilled. Thus, I beg to differ with the idea that education beyond primary level is not needed. It is hoped that people will continue to acquire knowledge through education, regardless of the levels of unemployment.

In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education - mẫu 8

It is a fact that several countries have a high unemployment rate nowadays. Therefore, it is not necessary for people to complete secondary school level. I personally disagree with the statement and the following essay will discuss it in detail.

It is undeniable that some countries have problems with unemployment these days. With the modern industrialisation, companies are reducing their employees gradually as they prefer to use the high technology machinery. And then many third world countries such as India, Pakistan or Bangladesh have a large population, but only several of them have high education. While the demand of low skill job is getting lesser, the population of low-skill workers is increasing rapidly in the past few years. As a result, the number of unemployed people has become higher than ever nowadays.

Based on that fact, it is really important for people to have good and high education. To obtain the qualification, people should have obtained the basic education that starts from the basic level until the senior high school. When the numbers of educated people in the country increase, they could get a lot of benefits. One of them is that more people will understand about birth control, which is important for controlling the population. And as the country's population slowly decreases, the unemployment rate will also gradually decline. Therefore, it is really important for the government to provide a decent education for their people.

In conclusion, it is true that many countries are facing unemployment issues currently. But I disagree if we should eliminate high school to solve the issues. Higher education would have a positive effect on the unemployment rate and therefore I recommend all children should complete their education until high school.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• It is believed that people who read for pleasure develop their imagination more and acquire better language skills compared to people who prefer watching a television. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• In some countries, parents expect their children to spend long time studying both in and after school and have less free time. What are the positive and negative effects on children and society they live in?

• As parents, they should be required to attend parenting courses every year to bring up their children well and give them a better environment for growth. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people think watching TV is bad for children, while others think that watching TV has more beneficial effects on children. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

• Some think that young people should be free to choose any career they like, while others say that they should be more realistic about their future. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

---