Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain. Others say films should have

Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain. Others say films should have educational value. Discuss both views and give your opinion hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Đề bài: Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain. Others say films should have educational value. Discuss both views and give your opinion

Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain. Others say films should have - mẫu 1

While some people consider films simply a source of entertainment, others suggest that films should be educational. Personally, I believe that films can be either, or both, entertaining and educational; however, it is up to each individual to choose what films they like to watch and for what reasons they watch them.

These days, films and TV are extremely popular forms of entertainment. Almost every household owns one or more televisions, and almost everybody loves to watch a certain television program or type of film. After a long day at work or school, many people simply want to come home and sit in front of the TV to relax and be entertained. They may not have the energy or enthusiasm to sit and learn about something. Furthermore, films and television programs are a part of the entertainment industry. The purpose of this industry is for entertainment, and it is a multibillion-dollar industry that creates jobs and generates a lot of money in many countries.

On the other hand, films and TV programs can have very strong effects on the minds of audiences and therefore people should be careful about how the contents of the films that they watch affect them and their families. For example, many people’s morals and values are shaped by what they watch on TV and in films. In addition, children can learn about right and wrong through the cartoons they watch, while adults can also learn many important lessons through watching films. For instance, watching a film about war may cause people to have a strong sense of patriotism for their country which could be seen as a positive educational effect.

In conclusion, while educational films, such as documentaries, can also be entertaining, and some films for entertainment can also have many educational aspects, I believe it is not necessary that all films need to be educational.

Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain. Others say films should have - mẫu 2

The purposes of watching films have been a topic of concern in modern society. While some people consider movies a source of entertainment with no other additional values, others believe in the educational benefits of them. As far as this is concerned, one cannot neglect the educational tonal aspect of these productions.

Films, regardless of genre, are a means of entertainment for people. Seeing a movie means people can temporarily escape from their daily life, which may help them relieve their stress and be mentally healthier. There are, in addition to this, some specific genres of movies such as comedy, which can make people laugh and become elated. In brief, films are true of great entertainment benefit.

It would be, however, an exaggeration to state that the sole purpose of movies is to entertain because other aspects of them such as the educational one are not negligible. Viewers have been using films to learn foreign languages, in a sense that listening to people conversing in a film is a great way to hear native actors and actresses speaking their language. Some others have, furthermore, watched films to learn about the culture and ways of life of other places on Earth. An excellent example of this is the documentary "love market in Sapa", from which people may learn about Sapa, a famous tourist attraction in the north of Vietnam.

In conclusion, movies can truly entertain people and simultaneously provide them with great educational benefits, such as learning a new language or culture. It is predicted that more people will consider films as essential learning materials in the future.

Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain. Others say films should have - mẫu 3

Opinions are divided on whether movies should solely serve as a mode of entertainment, or they should also have educational value. It is true that most filmmakers now place much importance on the entertainment side of movies, but I firmly believe that those movies can also teach viewers many things in life.

On the one hand, the only role that movies play is to entertain movie-goers, according to some. The key rationale of this view is that people often go to a movie in order to have a good time or to have something to talk about with their friends. Usually this means that they expect movies to have a special sound and spectacular visual effects as well as famous actors. For example, “Aquaman” starred Jason Momoa as well as having many epic battles. Such elements became talking points of the movie’s fans for weeks on end.

However, it is over-simplified to say that the effects of the movie are only confined to entertaining its fans. Anyone who has watched “Aquaman” will probably learn many crucial lessons in life such as failures are the steppingstone to success, greatness can only be achieved with patience or we should stand up against wars and cruelty. Since these lessons are not taught or usually overlooked in the educational setting in most countries, movies can be an ideal vehicle to instill in people such positive thoughts and values.

In my view, I am convinced that as well as giving movie fans a chance to have fun, a truly successful movie is often able to connect with them on a deeper level. Take, for example, “Friends with benefits”, a big box-office hit in 2011. The movie successfully conveyed a thorny social issue among young adults in the US, which was about young adults avoiding serious relationships and overlooking the meaning of sex and friendships. The movie had a ripple effect on and was also a wake-up call for many young people in the country. I would say the same for many other great movies such as Love Rosie, 50 first dates or 500 days of Summer, all of those are successful without starring any popular movie actor or having any epic scene because they can teach us important lessons in life or raise awareness of existing problems that people avoid talking about.

In conclusion, despite people having different views, I believe that movies can be and should be both recreational and educational. It is predicted that moviemakers would pay more attention to making cinematic productions capable of connecting with viewers on a deeper level.

Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain. Others say films should have - mẫu 4

Movies have come a long way since the first illustrations and shorts in the early twentieth century. While some believe in the catapulting role a movie brings in stirring a change, others opine that a movie should recluse to just entertainment and nothing more. I opine with the prior, as I feel that movies possess the power to spread the voices of the unheard over mainstream channels, and this essay explains the same.

Ever since India witnessed its first full-length motion picture in the name of “Raja Harishchandra”, cinema has become both a love affair for the cinephiles and a testament to human emotions. Nothing can come close to encapsulating the grandiose of K. Asif’s “Mughal-e-Azam”, or the teary eyes toward the end of James Cameron’s “Titanic”. But a cinematic experience has further evolved into inculcating educational values and spreading social messages. For instance, the Alia Bhatt – Shah Rukh Khan starrer “Dear Zindagi” gives us some important anecdotes on mental illnesses, especially depression, in a country where discussing psychological issues is still taboo. Apart from giving voice to topics that are neglected, movies possess the ability to give them a stage, relevance, everything culminating into an educating experience for the watcher. Further, they not only represent the age in which they are made but also encourage people to learn more about the historical events that are being shown on the screen, like in the period dramas and biographies.

On the other hand, an argument can be made against it. For instance, movies can be used to spread propaganda. World War II-era German films are often accused of this. Another argument suggests that movies can also go wrong in approaching a sensitive topic, thus drawing public ire. As a result, simply put, movies should focus on entertaining the masses. Moreover, movies don’t always explore the complete depth of a very important topic, portraying the skimmed portion of the top, thus risking the events wherein misinterpretation occurs.

Personally speaking, I am a proponent of freedom of speech. Hence, I believe that unless they aren’t harming the sentiments of anyone, movies spreading educational values is indeed a positive thing that should be empowered and promoted.

Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain. Others say films should have - mẫu 5

It is argued that movies are for the entertainment of the people because these relieve people’s stress; while, others consider that films should have another purpose, and that is to educate people. In my perspective, movies should hilariously serve both purposes as people will not get bored and understand things well.

To commence with, movies are considered only for entertainment purposes because people have a tight schedule, and due to their routine, they get bored, and they want something that can bring a smile on their face and must not make them feel about the burden of their life. So, they consider that movies must have only comical elements and should serve only this purpose. For example, the masses are experiencing mental strain, and at the end of the day, when they have to listen to the preachings of someone or advice of others, they feel more depressed. So, laughter in the movies removes their monotony and makes them feel cool and composed.

On the other hand, some advocates think movies must educate the viewers as they are more or less aware of the problems of their society due to the rigid nature of the work. It is assumed that the majority of folk watch films for their amusement. So if pictures are full of comedies and some educational purposes, then people will not get bored and, indirectly, they are familiar with the obstacles in their surroundings. For instance, people know that taking drugs or alcohol can have a detrimental effect on their health, but internally they are not influenced. Therefore, if the same thing is presented in the movies with a greater degree of emphasis on its outcomes, then people will realize well. So, I think it’s a good way to instruct people.

In conclusion, a few masses argue that movies are for relaxing them, while others think the film should educate them to make them known about the prevalent societal problems. In my perspective, these should serve both purposes, namely amusing the people and instructing them. It is best if they are instructed comically.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Films were produced by big companies in the past, but today people are able to make a film. Do you think this trend is positive or negative?

• Nowadays, there is a trend that reports in the media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development. Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news. However, others believe that they can get news better through another media platform. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

• The news media have too much influence on people’s lives today and this is a negative development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Online shopping is increasing dramatically. How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required?

---