Nowadays, there is a trend that reports in the media focus on problems and emergencies rather than

Nowadays, there is a trend that reports in the media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development. Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Đề bài: Nowadays, there is a trend that reports in the media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development. Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, there is a trend that reports in the media focus on problems and emergencies rather than - mẫu 1

It is common that the news media is often covered by problems and suffering. Although I agree with the idea that this trend adversely impacts individuals and society, I think that its advantages should be mentioned.

First, we should admit that the news on emergencies can save lives and reduce damage, especially during natural disasters. The media often reports the emergent news on storm attacks or earthquakes, for example, or the state of emergency often is declared via the media to concerned audiences. In doing so, people in danger can take corresponding actions to stay safe right away. Second, news reports on criminals and punishments can play a role in educating the public about justice, or it might deter people from committing crime, or people can know how to protect themselves from crime.

However, I think that when the news is filled with social issues and emergencies, it sometimes does more harm than good. The detailed description of crimes can help criminals as a source of training to break the law. Moreover, the media sometimes exaggerates the real threat of emergencies or dramatises criminal incidents in pursuit of drawing the public’s attention and increasing audience ratings, thereby generating higher profit from advertising. This means that many people have been living in fear and panic of crime or danger because of the misleading information from the media.

In conclusion, media reports on problems and emergencies can be informative for those who might be concerned, but the disadvantages are much stronger if the media focus too much on reporting those stories.

Nowadays, there is a trend that reports in the media focus on problems and emergencies rather than - mẫu 2

There are those who opine that the increasing news coverage of negative contents in the media can be detrimental to individuals and to the community. I totally agree with this idea because this kind of news can adversely affect people’s mental health and even cause them to panic.

First of all, being frequently exposed to news about issues and catastrophes can make people’s mental health deteriorate. This can be explained by the fact that people tend to lay more emphasis on negative things and remember them much longer than neutral and positive ones. In other words, people’s mental wellbeing may deteriorate if they are bombarded with too much bad news. For example, the world is suffering from the Covid-19 pandemic and the updates about the latest number of fatalities that are strewn daily in the media are contributing to a higher rate of distress, anxiety and depression suffered by people.

Another point is that the increasing number of news reports about problems and disasters in the media can create social fear, thereby steering people towards negative behaviors. For example, many people feel anxious about their safety and hesitate to get vaccinated for the Covid-19 virus because of the influence of stories in the media that exaggerate the side effects of the vaccines such as destroying the natural immunity of humans’ bodies. As a result, this can make it difficult for governments to eliminate the pandemic.

In conclusion, I believe that the increasing news about negative things that is broadcasted on newspapers, television and the internet can have detrimental impacts on people’s mental health and even fill them with dread. Therefore, it’s time for the authorities to create legislation to encourage the media to cover more positive stories.

Nowadays, there is a trend that reports in the media focus on problems and emergencies rather than - mẫu 3

It is true that these days news related to various issues and emergencies is relatively prevalent. Although in certain contexts this trend can be positive, by and large, I would argue that its negative impacts are more significant.

On the one hand, a focus on bad news and emergencies might be helpful to some extent. When people read news about crimes being committed, they may be terrified, but at the same time, they may become more cautious. For example, people may avoid walking alone late at night on badly lit streets, especially women, to avoid violent criminals. In addition, reports of nasty accidents like car crashes could help in raising people's awareness of road safety. Knowing how bad the consequence of driving while intoxicated or speeding is, they might obey the rules.

However, overwhelming coverage of bad news in the media does more harm than good. On an individual level, people are more likely to become unnecessarily pessimistic about life and become less friendly. For instance, when reading too much news about refugees carrying out crimes, people tend to have a prejudice against all refugees, claiming that they are a threat to their country. From a social perspective, an emphasis on bad news can lead to political unrest. This is because citizens may blame the government for deplorable situations or poor decisions, and then they will lose faith in their authorities. Consequently, there may be more demonstrations or riots against the government.

In conclusion, it is true that problems and emergencies have received widespread media coverage. While this tendency may be considered advantageous in some ways, I believe it brings about more detrimental effects.

Nowadays, there is a trend that reports in the media focus on problems and emergencies rather than - mẫu 4

The pervasive focus of media on crises over positive developments skews public perception, fostering an atmosphere of pessimism and fear. This essay contends that such a tendency detrimentally impacts both individuals and society, discussing its psychological effects and societal repercussions.

The relentless deluge of negative news acts as a catalyst for a vicious cycle of stress and anxiety among individuals. Research underlines that exposure to distressing media content can precipitate symptoms akin to post-traumatic stress, affecting even those not directly involved in the reported events. For instance, subsequent studies on the extensive media coverage of natural disasters and terrorist attacks reveal a notable uptick in anxiety and stress levels among viewers, transcending geographical boundaries. This psychological strain is further intensified by the phenomenon known as "negativity bias," where adverse events exert a disproportionately significant impact on an individual's mental state compared to positive or neutral events of similar magnitude. This predisposition means that negative news is not only more readily attended to but also leaves a lasting, more profound psychological imprint, enhancing the overall emotional toll on the public.

Furthermore, the media's skewed emphasis on negative occurrences fabricates a distorted reality, significantly undermining social trust and cohesion. Predominant portrayals of conflict, disaster, and corruption project a bleak outlook on the world, severely diminishing confidence in institutions and the goodwill among fellow citizens. Such a pessimistic worldview deters individuals from engaging in civic duties and participating in initiatives aimed at community betterment, as disillusionment with the possibility of positive change sets in. Moreover, this distorted perspective can aggravate societal divisions, prompting individuals and groups to resort to assigning blame rather than seeking cooperative solutions. The pervasive negativity in media narratives not only discourages optimism but also stifles the collective spirit essential for societal progress and unity, thereby impeding constructive dialogue and collaborative efforts towards solving communal challenges.

In conclusion, the media's predilection for reporting problems over positive developments has profound negative implications for individual well-being and the fabric of society. It is crucial to balance the narrative, highlighting achievements and progress alongside challenges, to foster a more accurate, optimistic, and cohesive community.

Nowadays, there is a trend that reports in the media focus on problems and emergencies rather than - mẫu 5

In the tapestry of our globally connected existence, the media's predilection for highlighting the adverse over the auspicious has sparked discourse concerning its detrimental influence on the psyche of individuals and the fabric of society at large. I staunchly argue that this disproportionate emphasis on negativity not only undermines individual mental health but also corrodes the pillars of societal trust, advocating for a paradigm shift towards equitable news reporting.

The relentless barrage of bleak narratives, spanning from environmental catastrophes to escalating crime rates, has been empirically linked to a decline in psychological well-being. Research by the American Psychological Association underscores a direct correlation between persistent exposure to negative news and a surge in stress, anxiety, and a pervasive sense of desolation. For instance, the aftermath of the 2008 financial debacle witnessed a marked increase in public anxiety and a waning sense of communal belonging, as evidenced by findings from the University of Sussex. This psychological burden transcends the personal sphere, impairing productivity in professional settings and straining social bonds, thus engendering a culture of negativity that permeates society.

The media's focus on crises overemphasizes danger, fostering societal distrust, a concept highlighted by Harvard's research on the 'Mean World Syndrome'. This skewed portrayal exaggerates crime perception, damaging communal bonds. Yet, the media's role in addressing significant issues, like their coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic, is undeniable. Introducing stories of achievement, from environmental victories to healthcare breakthroughs, could enrich public discourse. Embracing such narratives would not only balance the media landscape but also mend the fabric of societal trust, promoting a more optimistic and cohesive community view.

Conclusively, while the media's watchdog role is indispensable, its excessive negativity bears a profound toll on individual well-being and societal integrity. Advocating for a recalibrated approach to news reporting is not just preferable but essential for nurturing a more optimistic, unified society.

Nowadays, there is a trend that reports in the media focus on problems and emergencies rather than - mẫu 6

There is a prevailing sentiment among the general populace that the tendency of news reports is to prioritize sensational negative headlines over constructive societal progress. Many assert that this inclination towards focusing on problems and emergencies exerts detrimental effects on both individuals and the collective. I completely concur with this notion because negative news has the potential to breed a negative mindset in individuals, which can cause significant harm to social interactions.

The constant barrage of negative propaganda on issues such as violence, natural disasters, and diseases, to name a few, can adversely affect our cognitive processes and behavior. The overexposure to such content can lead us to believe that the world is teetering on the brink of collapse, despite the fact that numerous aspects of life have improved significantly over the past few decades. Individuals who consume an excessive amount of negative news tend to spend more time ruminating on their anxieties and fears. They suffer from a persistent feeling of apprehension and tend to view everything in a negative light. For example, the images of the 9/11 attacks in New York City triggered stress, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in many people who watched the coverage.

Moreover, the impact of negative news goes beyond individuals and affects society as a whole. Negative stories can have a ripple effect on how people interact with each other, as it leads to a general distrust of others. The fear and anxiety instilled by negative broadcasts can make individuals hyper-vigilant about issues such as homicide, violence, natural disasters, and other disturbing events. Irrespective of the authenticity of the news report, this negative mindset contributes to the rapid spread of negative propaganda and creates social chaos, eroding the foundation of trust that underpins any society.

In conclusion, the emphasis on negative news can create a sense of pessimism and world-weariness that leads us to view the state of the world in an excessively negative light. This negative mindset, in turn, facilitates the spread of negative propaganda and erodes trust within society.

Nowadays, there is a trend that reports in the media focus on problems and emergencies rather than - mẫu 7

In today’s rapidly evolving media landscape, the predilection of news outlets to spotlight crises and adversities over positive developments has ignited a debate about its impact on individual well-being and societal harmony. Contrary to the pervasive belief that such an emphasis is detrimental, this essay posits that the journalistic commitment to uncovering the truth is, in fact, beneficial to both individuals and society at large.

From an individual standpoint, being well-informed about current challenges is crucial for personal and professional development. News stories about societal issues or emergencies are not merely reports; they serve as cautionary tales that foster preparedness and resilience. For example, the recent increase in media coverage on human trafficking incidents has galvanized many women to adopt proactive measures for their safety. They have not only become more vigilant but have also pursued self-defense courses, illustrating how awareness can translate into empowerment. Thus, far from being harmful, such news items equip individuals with the knowledge and tools to navigate a complex world.

At the societal level, the relentless reporting on pressing issues plays a pivotal role in spurring governmental action and policy reform. A media landscape that exclusively celebrates successes, glossing over flaws and failures, would stifle progress by obscuring the need for improvement. It is through the diligent scrutiny of the media that governments are prompted to address and rectify societal issues. The persistent coverage of climate change, for example, has been instrumental in galvanizing international consensus on ambitious environmental targets, including the global initiative to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius by 2050. This underscores the media’s critical function as a watchdog that can instigate positive change.

In conclusion, the view that media's emphasis on negative events is detrimental overlooks its essential role in enlightening individuals and driving societal progress. By highlighting global issues, the media educates the public and ensures government accountability, leading to significant improvements. It's through this perspective that we should recognize the media's critical contribution to creating a more informed and proactive society.

Nowadays, there is a trend that reports in the media focus on problems and emergencies rather than - mẫu 8

The question of whether emergencies or positive stories should be featured on the news has been a recent topic of debate. Many believe we should try to focus on issues and situations of negative stories, whilst others believe that constant exposure to darker content on the news would cause people to turn away from news altogether. Personally, I believe that the news should maintain a balance of both positive and negative stories.

On the one hand, depressing or upsetting news might turn people away from watching them entirely, leading to a large contingent of people being under-informed. This is something cable news and traditional print media have failed to solve, as they prefer to maintain a pessimistic, sensationalist style of reporting in order to increase revenue. As a result, there has also been a recent sharp increase in, for example, the number of American youths who get their news through comedic news shows, as an effort to offset the gravity of the situations we are faced with every day.

On the other hand, it can be argued that focusing on ignoring negative issues will not make them go away, and informing the people of their existence might lead to better solutions. Countries and societies constantly need to change to adapt to pressing problems, and only by informing their citizens and involving them in the decision-making process can solutions be found. For example, the prospect of a climate catastrophe is gloomy, however, if there was no coverage on it, it could be judged that there would not have been as many environmental movements as there are today.

In conclusion, I argue that news outlets have a delicate balance to strike - they must achieve their goal of remaining objectively informative, whilst also presenting an image of the world that does not negatively affect their viewership.

Nowadays, there is a trend that reports in the media focus on problems and emergencies rather than - mẫu 9

These days, it is obviously observed that media news concentrating on social and urgent issues is more popular than positive development. Consequently, many people argued that this situation brings more detrimental impacts individually and socially. Although this trend can be positive to some extent, I am of the opinion that its negative effects are more significant.

On the one hand, it is true to say that when the news is filled with social matters and emergencies, it contributes positively to the damage reduction regarding natural disasters. For instance, the development of weather forecast and news programmes provides accurate and latest information in terms of the change of weather, social evils and current affairs. Thanks to the development of weather-forecasting methods, people, especially who are residents in the most affected area, have a tendency of being more cautious and having better preparation for the coming natural threats. Likewise, a high frequency of reports on social problems such as criminals, social evils and so on brings tremendous influences on raising people’s awareness, encouraging them to obey the laws and deterring them from committing crimes.

On the other hand, a focus on bad news and emergencies might pose threats to people’s minds and society. For instance, the thing that terrorism is increasing makes tourists become concerned and more hesitant to decide which country to visit. To some extent, audiences and readers are more likely to be unnecessarily pessimistic about daily life. Meanwhile, from a social perspective, the risks that children trying to imitate these social evils exist, especially those who are not educated well. Indeed, being rebellious is the first signal, then bullying others and even committing crimes in the near future if they are too affected and addicted to these harmful reports.

All things considered, negative impacts of media reports on problems and emergency issues are much more than its positive sides. Consequently, the volume of this news should be modified reasonably in order to reduce the potential risks and threats on individuals and society.

Nowadays, there is a trend that reports in the media focus on problems and emergencies rather than - mẫu 10

In this day and age, the media has a growing tendency to cover negative incidents instead of putting emphasis on positivity. Some people maintain that such a trend can prove inimical to individuals and society. From my perspective, I do not fully concur with this opinion as I believe this development offers both merits and demerits.

On the one hand, media coverage of problems can lead to several consequences. First of all, overemphasis on negativity can induce inordinate fear among citizens. Due to the horrendous cases broadcast on TV every day, it is now extremely common for people to become defensive and even avoid talking to strangers for fear that they could become victims of unscrupulous people. As a result, society would be rife with patterns of ostracism and human connections would gradually weaken. Moreover, these news reports can be destructive to young children who are at an impressionable age. It is possible that they will become apathetic or even imitate violent behaviors on TV.

On the other hand, citizens can also greatly benefit from the coverage of negative news and emergencies. Firstly, this news would act as a wake-up call for people to realize that they should be aware of many problems in order to protect themselves. For instance, news about fire outbreak because of carelessness can make people pay extra attention to inflammable objects in their houses so as to preclude similar incidents. In addition, news coverage on emergencies can sometimes strengthen the bond among the community. Take the case of the Manchester Arena bombing as an example. After the terrorist attack, the news was widely broadcast to inhabitants nearby so that they can provide sustenance, assistance or accommodation for those who survived the attack. This occasion illustrates the point that negative news coverage can provide the necessary conditions for a great sense of humanity to emerge.

In conclusion, that the media report negative situations can have not only unfavorable but also desirable impacts.

Nowadays, there is a trend that reports in the media focus on problems and emergencies rather than - mẫu 11

Considering the claim that the excessive focus of news items on pessimistic or alarming issues instead of optimistic events is damaging to each person and the community as a whole, I find it largely true.

The devastating effects of such news reports are much more severe than expected. On a personal level, with news media covering crimes, such as robberies, murders, and rapes, on a regular basis as can be seen in many countries today, people tend to suffer from feelings of insecurity wherever they go and whenever they are engaged in daily activities.

The reason is criminals are believed to be everywhere. On a societal level, this impact is even clearer: the spread of news about ever-increasing rates of cancer, AIDS, or other incurable conditions, for instance, shared on both conventional and modern media channels leads to social unrest or chaos, which may endanger the existence of political institutions.

With that being said, the media coverage of bad news somehow benefits the general public or international cooperation. These depressing reports might be sensational in the first place, but they act as a necessary tool warning people of possible danger, be it associated with crimes, health risks, or traffic accidents. And heart-breaking as it seems, a piece of news about a natural disaster occurring in a certain region could be a wake-up call resulting in global relief programs.

To recap, I am generally convinced by the idea that negative-focused news items on the media harm people and society. Sadly, the intensity of this problem tends to be on the rise in this day and age.

Nowadays, there is a trend that reports in the media focus on problems and emergencies rather than - mẫu 12

Considering the argument that the disproportionate focus of news coverage on negative or alarming events rather than positive ones is detrimental to both individuals and society as a whole, I find it largely valid.

The profound impacts of such news coverage are more significant than anticipated. On an individual level, with news media regularly reporting crimes like thefts, murders, and assaults, as is common in many countries today, people tend to experience heightened feelings of insecurity in their daily lives and activities.

The rationale is that criminals are perceived to be omnipresent. At a societal level, this influence is even more apparent: the dissemination of news regarding rising rates of diseases like cancer, AIDS, or other incurable conditions, for example, shared across both traditional and modern media platforms, contributes to social unrest or turmoil, potentially threatening the stability of political institutions.

Having said that, the media's coverage of negative news does serve a purpose for the general public and international cooperation. While these distressing reports may initially seem sensational, they serve as a necessary mechanism to alert people to potential dangers, whether related to crimes, health hazards, or traffic accidents. As heartbreaking as it may be, news of a natural disaster occurring in a particular region could prompt global relief efforts.

In summary, I am generally persuaded by the notion that media focusing on negative news harms individuals and society. Unfortunately, this issue appears to be worsening in the present era.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news. However, others believe that they can get news better through another media platform. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

• The news media have too much influence on people’s lives today and this is a negative development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Online shopping is increasing dramatically. How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required?

• Shops in the countryside are fewer and fewer, so people tend to go to stores in the towns and cities, and then lead to their inconvenient life. Car use also causes pollution. Is this phenomenon more harmful than the end?

• In some countries, small town-centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out-of-town stores. As a result, people without cars have limited access to out-of-town stores, and it may result in an increase in the use of cars. Do you think the disadvantages of this change outweigh its advantages?

---