With the growing population in cities, more and more people live in a home with small

With the growing population in cities, more and more people live in a home with small or no outdoor areas. Is it a positive or negative development? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Đề bài: With the growing population in cities, more and more people live in a home with small or no outdoor areas. Is it a positive or negative development?

With the growing population in cities, more and more people live in a home with small - mẫu 1

In recent years, cities around the world have experienced a rapid increase in population, resulting in more people living in homes with small or no outdoor areas. In my opinion, living in a home with limited outdoor space has some negative effects.

First of all, the lack of outdoor areas in homes and the lack of exposure to nature and fresh air can lead to a sedentary lifestyle and have negative health consequences. For example, a person living in a small apartment in a high-rise building in the heart of a city may not have access to a garden or a park to exercise. With limited space to move around in their home, they may be less likely to engage in physical activity, leading to a sedentary lifestyle. This can contribute to obesity, heart disease, diabetes, and other health problems.

Secondly, the absence of outdoor areas can also have a negative impact on social and community life. Without outdoor spaces, it can be challenging for communities to come together and organize events that bring people from diverse backgrounds together. For example, in a small apartment where there is limited access to outdoor space, it can be difficult for residents to host social events or participate in communal activities. This can lead to a sense of social isolation and disconnection from the wider community.

In conclusion, the absence of outdoor areas in cities can have a negative impact on social and community life. It is therefore crucial that policymakers and urban planners prioritize the provision of outdoor spaces and green areas in the planning and development of cities around the world.

With the growing population in cities, more and more people live in a home with small - mẫu 2

Rising urban population has made more urban dwellers opt for small living spaces. From my perspective, this trend in urban housing poses more threats than benefits.

On the one hand, tiny spaces offer homeowners a simple, frugal and blissfully stress-free lifestyle. First, given the limited space, one would have to make some hard choices about what to keep, and what to get rid of. They don’t feel weighed down by all the frivolous items they used to own or a huge mortgage, and they spend less time and money cleaning and maintaining their home, which allows more time and money for leisure activities. In addition, living in a tiny home can help save money in many different ways. People would be able to trim their monthly expenses on heating, cooling, property taxes, or home maintenance; and hence, put a little extra each month in the savings account.

However, opponents of this housing trend would argue that smaller spaces may be linked to health risks and privacy issues. Although micro-apartments may be fantastic for young professionals in their 20’s, they definitely can be unhealthy for older people who face different stress factors that can make tight living conditions a problem. Home is supposed to be a safe haven, and a resident with a demanding job may feel trapped in a claustrophobic apartment at night. Another main concern of putting people in tightly packed living situations is the fundamental lack of privacy to all residents, exerting negative influences on their well-being. There might be a trickle-down effect for children raised in these spaces, who might find it difficult to find a quiet, private room to read and complete their schoolwork.

In short, living in a tiny home does have compelling benefits, but it is not without its challenges as well. Taking the potential health risks and crowding challenges, I believe micro-living may not be the urban panacea we’ve been waiting for. All in all, tiny spaces should be seen as a negative development.

With the growing population in cities, more and more people live in a home with small - mẫu 3

It is true that an increasing number of people in urban areas are living in houses with cramped space and few or no outdoor areas. I think this is a negative development for some reasons below.

Firstly, stuffy living conditions can affect people’s moods. When there is little space for us to move around the house, we just lose our temper and get irritated being surrounded by four brick walls. Worse still, some space outside at the porch such as a garden with beautifully grown flowers can be a good remedy for people’s stress and anxieties. Without such spaces, the tension level just rises dramatically as when taking a look outside, what we can see is the bumper-to-bumper traffic with cars honking and dust drifting everywhere in the air, making house owners moody all day.

Secondly, convenience and productivity also suffer as a consequence. Families with many generations living under the same roof would often complain about the lack of privacy when their houses are too small and narrow. The kids will feel humiliated and ashamed if they plan to invite their friends over for playing, or the father may have to abandon his hobby of playing saxophone so as to save others the nuisance of loud noises from his instrument. As for me, sometimes I cannot concentrate on my schoolwork, seeing others walk back and forth in the house. This just makes me get distracted and I often have to wait for others to sleep and then do my homework.

In conclusion, from what I think and from my personal experience, living in a small house is too disadvantageous, so this is definitely a negative development on the whole.

With the growing population in cities, more and more people live in a home with small - mẫu 4

These days, it is quite common that city dwellers do not always reside in a place with a spacious outdoor area because of the increasing urban population. As far as I am concerned, I believe that this is a beneficial development. The main reason why I consider this trend positive is that if city people live in a place where there is only a small or no outdoor area, the housing shortage can be mitigated. If residential areas are full of high-rise apartment buildings rather than houses, living space can be secured. In this case, people pouring into cities from rural areas for various purposes will not suffer from poor living conditions.

Another benefit is related to the environment. Compared with building houses with large outdoor space, constructing apartments in a high-rise building occupies less land, which is not necessarily at the cost of excessively destroying the habitats of different species of flora and fauna on the earth. This, in fact, is an effective and sustainable way for human beings to achieve their goals while being able to preserve the balance of the ecosystem.

Admittedly, when people’s homes have no big outdoor areas, the fun of life can be spoiled. If people want to do exercise, they have to go out to the nearby park or gym. Children are forced to go to the playground for interesting games, such as playing frisbee. People are unable to invite friends to come for barbeque parties on weekends. In contrast, all the activities can be performed within their own property if there is a big outdoor area.

In conclusion, I believe that although inconvenience may be caused to people’s life, the positive influences are more noticeable, which include the resolution of housing shortages in cities and the contributions made to the environment during urban development. Therefore, governments in cities should be encouraged to give priority to offering people homes with small or no outdoor areas.

With the growing population in cities, more and more people live in a home with small - mẫu 5

In contemporary urban landscapes, the surge in population density has led to a notable trend: an increasing number of individuals are residing in compact accommodations, often devoid of substantial outdoor areas. This phenomenon has elicited polarised opinions regarding its implications. While some view it as a concerning development, others contend that it may carry certain benefits.

On one hand, the dwindling availability of spacious housing with ample outdoor space raises legitimate concerns because limited living quarters can contribute to feelings of claustrophobia and stress among residents. This arises as the absence of outdoor areas may impede opportunities for recreation and relaxation, potentially compromising residents' overall well-being. As a consequence, individuals might find it challenging to establish connections with nature, which is integral to mental and physical health.

Conversely, proponents of this trend argue that compact living can foster resource efficiency and a sense of community. In densely populated areas, smaller dwellings often translate to shorter commutes and reduced carbon emissions, factors of utmost importance given the issue of city pollution. Moreover, the proximity of neighbours in compact housing units can facilitate social interactions and mutual support networks, thereby promoting a stronger sense of belonging and solidarity among residents.

In conclusion, the phenomenon of residing in small houses without substantial outdoor space presents a complex tapestry of advantages and drawbacks. In my view, while it may contribute to feelings of confinement and limit opportunities for outdoor activities, the potential to foster community cohesion and environmental sustainability is of upmost importance in today's world, and therefore overall, it is a positive development.

With the growing population in cities, more and more people live in a home with small - mẫu 6

The globe has experienced a paradigm shift in migration in this era of globalization, with more rural residents becoming city dwellers these days. From antiquity to the present, choosing where to live has been a major preoccupation. Although urbanization is the watchword of the day, few people feel that it is the best location to flourish, while others prefer rural living. Let us compare and contrast the advantages and disadvantages of living in a city and in the countryside.

Recent technological developments have aided urban living in a variety of ways. Cities have more obvious modes of transportation and communication than villages. In addition, urban industries and businesses provide a wealth of chances for professionals and entrepreneurs. Younger generations prefer to live in the city, where they may be surrounded by luxury, rather than in the countryside. Another significant factor to consider in this regard is the recent shift in the medical profession; many of these modern facilities are only available in urban areas. In addition to all of this, the city has evolved into a social hub for the wealthy and privileged, allowing one to have the luxury of knowing them. Celebrities and politicians, for example, are more likely to be found at social clubs or parties than at a country gathering.

As previously said, there are several reasons for one's choosing to live in a city rather than a village in today's world; nevertheless, one of them that deserves special attention is the level of education that a city provides. Education is said to liberate people from societal stigmas. In comparison to the rural side, metropolitan living is always associated with a well-organized and qualified educational system. When compared to a hamlet, a city would be the preferred location for finding efficient schools, universities, and research centers.

In the end, both urban and rural habitation have their advantages and disadvantages; however, choosing a place to live should be prioritized based on individual requirements. An ideal example would be an IT professional who should become a part of a city for his career advancement, whereas a farmer would fit in a rural sector for his livelihood. I've lived in a city since I was a youngster, and I'd like to continue in the same boat for the rest of my life.

With the growing population in cities, more and more people live in a home with small - mẫu 7

To accommodate increasing urban populations, many cities are extending higher today. This, in my opinion, is a better option than supporting urban development since it may help conserve surrounding land for other uses.

Some say that towering cities provide problems to residents and that a more spread-out metropolis provides a higher quality of life. Because of the consequences of overpopulation on sanitation, safety, and traffic conditions, large metropolitan places with many towering apartment buildings, such as New York City or Shanghai, are notoriously difficult to live in.

Decentralized cities, on the other hand, such as Los Angeles and Nashville, allow for the creation of unique local neighborhoods, greater room for residential buildings, and a reduction in the aforementioned urban difficulties. Individuals who live in these places frequently report higher levels of happiness, and many "transplants" relocate to these cities because of the higher living standards.

Those in favor of taller structures, on the other hand, can reasonably point to the benefits to the surrounding region. It is frequently difficult to control the expansion of economically significant cities, which can result in huge urban sprawl, as is the situation in the areas around Mexico City and Tokyo. The surrounding region can be maintained or repurposed by adding more buildings. National parks can be created from pristine natural areas. If the city requires additional food to feed its people, nearby farms with quick delivery periods may be available. This undeveloped area may be developed into peaceful suburban villages, allowing families to raise a family outside of the city while earning a high salary and having easy access to the cultural amenities of big cities. To summarise, horizontal cities provide certain benefits to residents, but higher cities make more sense in today's environment. Nonetheless, striking a balance and providing excellent infrastructure to minimize the difficulties created by expanding urban populations is critical.

With the growing population in cities, more and more people live in a home with small - mẫu 8

Many people in metropolitan settings are said to prefer small space living without access to the outdoors. Personally, I feel that this inclination has both advantages and disadvantages.

Living in a tiny place has a number of financial benefits. Mass migrations from rural regions to megacities have increased population density in many nations, resulting in high housing prices. As a result, renting tiny flats rather than houses with customized outside spaces would be more cost-effective for new inhabitants, particularly those with low incomes.

A modest apartment in Da Nang, for example, can cost approximately 70,000 dollars, but a moderate-sized house with open space costs at least 200,000 dollars. Furthermore, individuals who live in tiny apartments do not need to spend a lot of money on appliances or house upkeep, allowing them to save a little extra money each month. Despite the advantages listed above, I feel that minor accommodation might cause residents to suffer. For starters, living in this sort of environment can lead to a loss of privacy, which can have a detrimental impact on an individual's independence.

For example, because I share a tight flat in a high-rise building with my sister and uncle, it's tough for me to spend time alone. Second, outside areas such as front yards are great for exercising and planning family activities like barbeque parties. People who live in a residence with no open areas are less likely to engage in such activities, leading to a sedentary lifestyle. To sum up, I believe that living in tiny houses or flats with little open space has both positive and negative consequences.

With the growing population in cities, more and more people live in a home with small - mẫu 9

As cities’ populations rise, an increasing number of people live in apartments with limited or no outside space. It is, in my opinion, a detrimental development since it harms people’s health and productivity.

To begin with, living in a small place can lead to a variety of health issues. There is little doubt that a lack of outside space impairs cross-ventilation in the room, which promotes respiratory illnesses. Utilizing time in such an atmosphere for an extended amount of time is a difficult undertaking since it fosters lethargy. The metro cities of India are prominent instances, where the corona pandemic spread was greater than in other locations due to a shortage of room within the residences.

Furthermore, it results in a significant drop in convenience, which significantly reduces people’s production. It is a well-known truth that families with many generations living in the same house frequently lack privacy when the house is tiny and narrow. They are hesitant to invite visitors to their houses for festivities. Aside from that, the youngsters do not have a peaceful environment in which to learn. And, when one of the family members falls ill, the other member’s life becomes difficult owing to a shortage of room. To provide an example, during my undergraduate years, I moved to a small flat with four other convicts; during that period, my focus level dropped significantly, resulting in low marks.

To summarise, living in a home with a tiny or no outdoor area is a risky strategy since it influences people’s physical and emotional well-being. Additionally, it lowers their productivity.

With the growing population in cities, more and more people live in a home with small - mẫu 10

It is evident that an increasing number of city dwellers are living in cramped conditions with barely any open air due to population growth. Apparently, this can be considered as one of modern developments, but nevertheless poses negative impacts on these urban residents.

That reduction in living space means lower expenses do not seem to be an unseen advantage, for the price or rental fee for homes are undeniably charged in accordance with their sizes. Plus, they possess more affordable utilities, for example they need to spend less on bills for water, gas, or electricity on a monthly basis. Another point worth mentioning is that residential areas with tighter home space tend to be more populated, which, to some extent, has a great social aspect. This, interestingly, brings about the sense of community typical for rural regions, strengthening life-long connections between local inhabitants.

Looking deeper into the problem, however, there lie several adverse effects beneath the prevalence of such living conditions, especially with the lack of outdoor spaces. These residential areas can sometimes be overcrowded, leading to the feeling of being trapped for people in their own property. Under no circumstances should this issue be ignored, for domestic violence and substance abuse may well be the result. Furthermore, children fostered in tightly packed situations can also suffer from certain mental health problems. Without the chance of participating in outdoor activities, they are prone to end up becoming withdrawn or cannot achieve the optimal level of concentration for their study.

With that being said, when it comes to tiny housing, the consequences are indeed insidious, which outweigh some convincing advantages. Certainly, governments are expected to introduce new initiatives to allocate population in a more proper way.

With the growing population in cities, more and more people live in a home with small - mẫu 11

With the growing population of cities, more city dwellers are having to live in cramped houses with no outdoor spaces. In my opinion, this trend brings about both positive and negative aspects, however, I believe its advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

On the one hand, there is no denying the fact that when living in a tiny home without big windows and sufficient green space nearby, residents will be prone to some negative feelings. This is due to the fact that residents do not have any space for recreational activities, such as watering flowers or playing with their pets, after dealing with a heavy workload or stressful day. They therefore may feel exasperated within their apartments, and this can lead to a number of mental health problems such as depression.

However, although living in tiny houses possesses some downsides, the potential benefits are also numerous. The initial advantage is that living in a small house prevents frivolous spending on items that are only used to fill a space rather than to fulfil a function, helping people to be more disciplined with money. Along with buying less stuff because they have no room for it, they will also avoid wasting time on maintaining all that stuff. Small houses, moreover, encourage family bonding, creating an environment where family members can get organized and make the home a happy place. In comparison to larger accommodation, where there are separate rooms for each member, small homes offer a common living space for the whole family, which will provide more opportunities for the family to talk and share stories and feelings.

In conclusion, although small houses can be possibly detrimental to the occupant’s feelings, I still believe that living in limited space seems to be more beneficial to city dwellers when it comes to good financial management and family bonding.

With the growing population in cities, more and more people live in a home with small - mẫu 12

Due to the growing population in cities, a rising number of individuals live in accommodations with small or no outdoor areas. In my opinion, it is a negative development because it negatively affects people’s health and declines productivity.

To begin with, spending life in accommodation with little space could invite numerous health problems. There is no denying this conviction that lack of outdoor space affects the cross ventilation in the room that causes respiratory disorders. Utilizing time in such an environment for long period is a daunting task, as it encourages laziness. The metro cities of India are the prime examples, where due to lack of space inside the houses, the corona pandemic spread was higher than in other areas.

Moreover, it leads to a sizeable reduction in convenience that declines people’s output substantially. It is an accomplished fact that families with many generations living in the same accommodation would usually lack privacy when their house is small and narrow. They find it uncomfortable to invite people to their homes for celebrations. Apart from this, the children do not get a serene environment for study. And, when some family member goes unwell, the other member’s life becomes challenging, due to lack of space. To quote my experience, during my college years, I shifted to a small flat with four inmates. During that time, my concentration level declined considerably, resulting in poor grades.

To conclude, spending life in an abode with a small or no outdoor area is an imprudent approach because it impacts the physical and emotional well-being of people. Furthermore, it reduces their output too.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road might cause some problems. What are the problems? What could be done to solve those problems?

• Today, TV channels provide more men’s sports shows than women’s sport shows. Why? Should TV channels give equal time for women’s sport and men’s sport?

• Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?

• The best way to travel is traveling in a group led by a tour guide. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

• In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. Why might this be the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?

---