The charts below show the water levels of 6 cities in Australia in October

Trang trước Trang sau

The charts below show the water levels of 6 cities in Australia in October 2009 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Đề bài: The charts below show the water levels of 6 cities in Australia in October 2009 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words

The charts below show the water levels of 6 cities in Australia in October

The charts below show the water levels of 6 cities in Australia in October - mẫu 1

The presented bar chart illustrates the variations in water levels across six Australian cities during October 2009 and 2010.

Overall, the majority of the surveyed cities witnessed an upward trend in the water levels in the reservoirs in October 2010 compared to the preceding year. The only two exceptions were Darwin, where the water level decreased, and Brisbane which recorded no change. In addition, Canberra was the city with the highest percentage of water stored in its reservoirs in both years.

In October 2009, Sydney and Canberra had the most abundant water reserves, with approximately 75% water capacity each. Brisbane, Darwin, and Perth followed, registering figures ranging from 40% to approximately 55%. In contrast, Melbourne recorded the lowest water percentage in its reservoirs, hovering around 25%.

One year later, Perth witnessed the largest increase in water levels, hitting a high of just above 70%. Having a similar trend, the figure for Canberra reached a peak of nearly 100%, making it the city with the highest level of water. Although Sydney and Melbourne also experienced upward trends, their growth was less pronounced, with respective figures in 2010 of 80% and 40%. Conversely, Darwin encountered a notable decline in its reservoir water, decreasing to just under 30% of its capacity in October 2010. Finally, the figure for Brisbane remained unchanged compared to the previous year.

The charts below show the water levels of 6 cities in Australia in October - mẫu 2

The bar chart illustrates the changes in the levels of water in reservoirs across six Australian urban areas between October 2009 and the same month in 2010.

Overall, the water level in Darwin decreased over the period in question, whereas the opposite was true in the case of the other cities, except for Brisbane, where no changes were recorded. Additionally, Canberra had replaced Sydney to become the city with the highest percentage of water stored in its reservoir by the end of the period.

In October 2009, Sydney and Canberra had more water at their disposal than any other city listed, as around 75% of their reservoir levels were filled. These metropolises were followed by Brisbane, Darwin, and Perth, with their figures ranging from 40% to nearly 60%. In the last position was Melbourne, whose water reservoir was just over a fifth full.

After one year, the capital city took the lead, with its water level increasing to a high of close to 100% of the total storage capacity. Sydney and Melbourne followed similar trends, albeit at lower rates, rising to 80% and 40%, respectively. The largest rise was seen in the proportion of water stored in Perth’s reservoir, reaching approximately 70%. This contrasts starkly with the data for Darwin, where a fall to roughly 25% was reported, and lastly, the figure for Brisbane stayed the same.

The charts below show the water levels of 6 cities in Australia in October - mẫu 3

The bar chart delineates the fluctuations in water levels within reservoirs across six urban regions in Australia from October 2009 to the corresponding month in 2010.

Across the period, Darwin experienced a decline in water reserves, while the other cities observed an increase, except Brisbane, where no alterations were evident. Notably, Canberra surpassed Sydney to secure the position of the city with the highest water storage percentage in its reservoirs by the end of the period.

In October 2009, Sydney and Canberra boasted the highest water storage among the listed cities, with both locations holding approximately 75% of their reservoir capacities. Following them were Brisbane, Darwin, and Perth, maintaining levels varying from 40% to nearly 60%. Melbourne recorded the lowest water reserves, barely exceeding a fifth of its storage capacity.

Over the course of the year, Canberra ascended to the forefront, with its reservoirs reaching nearly 100% capacity. Meanwhile, Sydney and Melbourne exhibited growth, albeit at slower rates, achieving 80% and 40%, respectively. Perth demonstrated the most substantial rise, with its water reserves escalating to around 70%. In contrast, Darwin experienced a sharp drop to approximately 25%. Brisbane’s water storage level remained constant throughout the duration.

The charts below show the water levels of 6 cities in Australia in October - mẫu 4

The bar chart delineates the percentages of water in reservoirs in various cities in Australia in October 2009 and 2010.

Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that reservoirs in all cities witnessed rising water levels, except Darwin and Brisbane. Sydney and Canberra’s water levels were generally more notable, though Perth demonstrated the strongest growth.

The percentage of water in reservoirs in Sydney in October 2009 was most prominent at around 78%, followed by Canberra, Perth, and Melbourne at 76%, precisely 40%, and slightly over 20%, respectively. The figure for water levels in these cities all experienced rises over one year, with Sydney growing most marginally to roughly 81%, Canberra more substantially to 99%, Perth most dramatically to 70%, and Melbourne nearly doubling to 40%.

In October 2009, Brisbane’s water levels stood at approximately 56%, with Darwin’s data trailing slightly at 45%. Over the following year, Brisbane’s figure thereafter remained unaltered, while Darwin’s dipped considerably to about 23%.

The charts below show the water levels of 6 cities in Australia in October - mẫu 5

The bar chart illustrates how the water levels in reservoirs across six Australian cities - Darwin, Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, and Canberra - changed between October 2009 and October 2010.

Overall, water levels in most cities increased over the one-year period, with the exceptions of Darwin, which saw a decrease, and Brisbane, which remained constant. In 2009, Sydney and Canberra had the highest water levels, while in 2010, Canberra took the lead.

In October 2009, Sydney and Canberra had the highest water levels, with their reservoirs at around 75% of capacity. Brisbane followed closely with about 55%. Darwin and Perth were next, with water levels at roughly 45% and 40% respectively. Melbourne recorded the lowest levels, with just over 20% of its reservoirs filled.

By October 2010, Canberra experienced a dramatic increase, with water levels soaring to nearly 100%, the highest among all the cities. Perth and Melbourne both also saw a significant rise to around 70% and 40% respectively. Sydney’s levels, on the other hand, gained minimally to reach 80%. Conversely, the amount of water stored in Darwin dropped significantly after a year, decreasing to just under 30% of its capacity in October 2010. Finally, the number in Brisbane remained the same.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

Trang trước Trang sau
Đề thi, giáo án các lớp các môn học