The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur

The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Đề bài: The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur - mẫu 1

The bar chart delineates the utilization of various methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman.

An overview of the data highlights that landfill is the predominant method of waste disposal in Toronto and a significant practice in Amman, while Kuala Lumpur favors incineration. Madrid's waste disposal is more evenly distributed among landfill, incineration, and recycling, whereas composting remains the least employed method across all cities.

Delving into specifics, Toronto’s reliance on landfill is markedly evident, with over 70% of its waste processed this way. Amman also leans on this method, albeit to a lesser degree, at nearly 50%. In contrast, Madrid and Kuala Lumpur allocate 29% and 15% to landfilling, respectively. Incineration is Kuala Lumpur’s chief strategy, handling over half of its waste. Madrid and Amman follow, utilizing incineration for 40% and 38% of waste disposal. Toronto exhibits a minimal use of incineration.

Recycling is notably utilized in Madrid and Kuala Lumpur, each city reprocessing roughly 23% of its waste. However, this method accounts for only a tenth of Amman's waste management and is even less in Toronto. Composting garners minimal percentages, ranging from 2% to 9% across the board.

The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur - mẫu 2

The illustrative bar graph provides a comparative analysis of the methods of waste disposal in four distinct cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman.

In an overarching perspective, it's evident that landfill dominates as the primary method in Toronto, with a substantial prevalence in Amman as well. Conversely, Kuala Lumpur exhibits a strong preference for incineration. Madrid represents a more diversified approach, evenly distributing its waste management practices across three methods, while composting is notably the least favored method across all cities.

Detailing the nuances of the graph, Toronto's commitment to landfill is significant, with an overwhelming 70% of its waste managed in this manner. Amman's reliance on landfill is also noteworthy, constituting nearly half of its waste treatment. Madrid and Kuala Lumpur, meanwhile, show a lesser dependency on landfill, with 29% and 15% respectively. Kuala Lumpur's waste disposal strategy is predominantly characterized by incineration, which accounts for over half of its waste processing. This method is also substantial in Madrid and Amman, claiming 40% and 38% respectively. In Toronto, however, incineration plays a minimal role.

The recycling efforts are quite prominent in Madrid and Kuala Lumpur, with both cities recycling approximately 23% of their waste. Amman and Toronto are less focused on recycling, with it accounting for a minor fraction of their waste disposal methods. Composting, while the least utilized of the methods of waste disposal in four cities, shows a consistent yet minor application across the municipalities.

The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur - mẫu 3

The bar chart elucidates the differing methods of waste disposal employed across Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman.

A cursory glance at the chart reveals two prominent trends: firstly, landfill is the most favored method in Toronto and a key method in Amman, and secondly, incineration is the method of choice in Kuala Lumpur. In contrast, Madrid’s waste disposal methods are more evenly spread across landfill, incineration, and recycling, with composting being the least utilized method of waste disposal in all four cities.

Toronto’s waste disposal strategy is heavily skewed towards landfill, with an impressive 70% of its waste managed through this method. Amman, while less reliant, still sees landfill handling a significant 50% of its waste. Madrid and Kuala Lumpur present a reduced reliance on landfill, with 29% and 15% of their waste treated by this method, respectively. On the other hand, Kuala Lumpur prominently utilizes incineration for over half of its waste management, a method that is also considerably employed in Madrid and Amman, with 40% and 38% of their waste disposed of respectively. Toronto exhibits only a marginal use of incineration.

When it comes to recycling, both Madrid and Kuala Lumpur are on par, each allocating around 23% of their waste management to this eco-friendly method. In stark contrast, recycling plays a minor role in the waste disposal methodologies of Toronto and Amman. Lastly, composting, despite its environmental advantages, is the least adopted of the methods of waste disposal in the four cities, with percentages lingering between 2% and 9%.

The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur - mẫu 4

The given bar graph shows data on the four different waste disposal methods used in Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. As is presented in the data, Landfill and Incineration are two most common ways of waste disposal in these four cities.

According to the bar graph, Toronto disposes of more than 70% of its waste by Landfilling while Amman usages this method to dispose of almost half of its waste. In Madrid and Kuala Lumpur, this method is used to dispose consecutively of 29% and 18% of their wastages. Incineration is another popular method of waste disposal and Kuala Lumpur uses this method to dispose of more than half of its wastages. This method is used to dispose of 38% and 40% of waste respectively in Amman and Madrid. Again, Recycling of wastages is used to dispose of about 23% garbage in Kuala Lumpur and Madrid. This method is used only to dispose of less than 10% of total wastages in Toronto and Amman. The least used method of waste disposal is Compositing and this method is used to dispose of about 2-8% of total wastages in these four cities.

The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur - mẫu 5

The given graph presents data on the various waste handling methods implemented in Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman.

Overall, it could be seen that each urban area has a different preference for waste treatment. Meanwhile, in all of these cities, incineration and landfill are the two most important and widely used garbage disposal solutions.

As shown in the graph, Toronto is responsible for landfilling more than two-thirds of the waste. On the contrary, Amman disposes of about half of its waste using this manner. The similar method is employed to get rid of 15% and 29% of waste in Kuala Lumpur and Madrid, respectively. In terms of incinerating waste, Kuala Lumpur treats more than half of its waste utilising approach, which is the other prominent one. Furthermore, this technique simultaneously contributes to the elimination of 40% and 38% of the rubbish in Madrid and Amman.

In Madrid and Kuala Lumpur, approximately a quarter of the garbage is disposed of through waste recycling. This technique is only applied to less than a tenth of the total trash in Amman and Toronto. Compositing, which accounts for just 2–8% of the total garbage generated across all cities, is the least popular option for waste removal.

The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur - mẫu 6

The bar graph shows information on varying waste disposal methods used in Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. We observe that Incineration and Landfill are the two significant and most common waste disposal methods in all of these cities.

Toronto is liable for collection of more than 70% of the waste through Landfilling. On the other hand, Amman uses this method to dispose of nearly half of its waste.

In both Kuala Lumpur and Madrid, the same process is used to dispose of 18% and 29% of sequential wastage.

Incineration is the second most popular method. Kuala Lumpur uses this way to dispose of more than half of its waste. Also, in Madrid and Amman, this method contributes to the disposal of 40% and 38% of the trash, respectively.

Recycling is used to dispose of nearly 20% of the garbage in Kuala Lumpur and Madrid. In Amman and Toronto, this method is used only for less than 10% of the total waste.

The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur - mẫu 7

The bar chart depicts four types of waste disposal in four cities. Landfill was the most popular method of waste disposal in Toronto and Amman. Toronto used landfill for disposing of about three-quarters of its waste with the remaining quarter split between incineration, recycling and composting.

Amman used landfill for disposing of almost half of its waste with most of the rest being incinerated. Incineration was the most popular method of waste disposal in Madrid and Kuala Lumpur.

Kuala Lumpur is disposed of more than half its waste by incineration with less than one quarter going for recycling and even less still going for landfill and composting. Recycling was the second least popular method of waste disposal.

No cities disposed of more than 25% of its waste by recycling and in the case of Toronto, it was less than 10%. Composting was the least common method of waste disposal. No cities disposed of more than 10% of its waste by compositing and Amman hardly did any composting.

The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur - mẫu 8

The given graph showcases data on varying waste disposal methods used in Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. According to the presentation, Incineration and Landfill are the two significant and most common waste disposal methods in all of these cities.

As stated in the graph, Toronto is liable for disposing of more than 70% of the waste through Landfilling. On the contrary, Amman uses this method to dispose of approximately half of its waste. In both Kuala Lumpur and Madrid, the same process is used to dispose of 18% and 29% of sequential wastage. As far as Incineration – the other popular method is concerned – Kuala Lumpur uses this way to dispose of more than half of its waste. Simultaneously, in Madrid and Amman, this method contributes to the disposal of 40% and 38% of the trash, respectively.

Waste recycling is used to dispose of nearly 23% of the garbage in Kuala Lumpur and Madrid. In Amman and Toronto, this method is used only for less than 10% of the total waste. Out of all, the least used method for waste disposal is Compositing, and it is used only for 2-8% of the total waste in all of the cities.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• The table below gives information on internet use in six categories by age group. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

• The diagram illustrates how bees produce honey. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

• The graph gives information about drinking habits of the US population by age. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

• The table shows the average length of YouTube video advertisements and average length of time viewers spend watching them. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

• The table shows the percentage of journeys made by different forms of transport in four countries. The bar graph shows the results of a survey into car use. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

---