Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking

Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking or dressing should not be taught. To what extent do you agree or disagree? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Đề bài: Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking or dressing should not be taught. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking - mẫu 1

Some people hold a belief that schools should be a place where students study academic subjects to pass examinations rather than learn skills such as dressing and cookery. In my opinion, despite the significance of academic study and exams, students should also be taught fundamental life skills.

On the one hand, studying academic knowledge is vital for students in many ways. First, examination results are essential for students’ academic record. With good results, they will have an advantage in the national high school exams in which their academic performance after many years of study is considered. Second, academic subjects equip students with fundamental knowledge that will be used in tertiary education. For example, most undergraduates in Vietnam are supposed to pass subjects, such as Microeconomics and Advanced Mathematics, which are comprised of mathematical knowledge taught at high school. Without a deep understanding, students may fail the final exams and have to study these subjects again, which is time-consuming and costly.

However, there are several reasons why students still need to learn practical skills. For instance, when college students live far from family, life skills such as cooking will be helpful since students will be able to prepare healthy and affordable meals on their own instead of eating out at restaurants. Attending skill-building classes at school is also an effective way for students to unwind after many hours of studying academic subjects. Through a wide range of activities, students are able to relax and as a result perform better in exams.

In conclusion, I disagree that students should only study academic subjects because both academic knowledge and practical skills are equally important and should be taught at school.

Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking - mẫu 2

A few individuals hold a conviction that schools ought to be a place where understudies ponder scholastic subjects to pass examinations instead of learning aptitudes such as dressing and cookery. In my opinion, in spite of the noteworthiness of scholarly ponder and exams, understudies ought to too be instructed in crucial life aptitudes.

On the one hand, considering scholarly information is imperative for understudies in numerous ways. To begin with, examinations are fundamental for students' scholarly records. With great things coming about, they will have an advantage within the national tall school exams in which their scholastic execution after numerous years of pondering is considered. At the moment, scholarly subjects prepare understudies with principal information that will be utilized in tertiary instruction. For case, most students in Vietnam are assumed to pass subjects, such as Microeconomics and Progressed Science, which are comprised of numerical information instructed in high school. Without a profound understanding, students may fall flat, which is time-consuming and expensive. In any case, there are a few reasons why understudies still have to learn viable abilities. For instance, when college understudies live distant from family, life aptitudes such as cooking will be accommodating since understudies will be able to plan solid and reasonable dinners on their own instead of eating out at eateries. Going to aptitude-building classes at school is additionally a successful way for understudies to loosen up after numerous hours of examining scholarly subjects. Through a wide range of exercises, understudies are able to unwind and as a result, perform way better in exams.

In conclusion, I oppose the idea that understudies ought to ponder academic subjects since both scholastic information and viable abilities are similarly critical and ought to be instructed at school.

Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking - mẫu 3

Recently, there has been a debate about whether non-academic courses like cooking and dressing should be eliminated so that students can focus solely on academic subjects in preparation for their exams. I disagree with this suggestion due to the advantages that a well-rounded education, including both academic and non-academic subjects, offers to students.

Among the various benefits is the truth that understudies secure preparation around life aptitudes. Learning around a few of these subjects includes minutes of cooperation, versatility, assurance, and issue fathoming. All these are imperative aptitudes people are to have so as to live entirely within society, have great working encounters with co-workers, and accomplish more in life. For example, tall school understudies who learned how to cook in school may be able to create their own dinners when they are in college. Furthermore, it advances self-expression, self-disclosure, and imagination. Numerous scholarly courses are regimental in their design, and this involves that these designs are followed to. While cooking and dressing have a bit more adaptable design which empowers the actualization of these benefits specified. An illustration can be seen among understudies who choose to utilize changing styles for their furnishings since it distinguishes their identity.

To conclude, having understudies experience both viewpoints of formal instruction has more positive prospects than something else since of the life abilities and individual advancement that they may secure near their scholarly information.

Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking - mẫu 4

To achieve their learning goals, students need to prepare their subjects to pass the exams. On the other hand, there is also a practical aspect to the exams that are less demanding than academic ability. Prioritizing academic subjects is a must considering that not all students are ready to tackle different subjects. However, there is another side to the journey toward a student's career plan, which we will discuss in more detail in this essay. On the one hand, many academic subjects are offered in schools, so students are not able to cope with the topics that are supposed to be asked in the exam. In this case, teachers give them tricks to make it easier to answer what is asked. Also, students are usually interested in practical activities that do not put them under pressure during the exam. Since they have already mastered these skills, they just need to improve them on their own, by watching YouTube or other methods. This is certainly different in the case of academic subjects that are not appealing to all students. On the other hand, it is beneficial for students to develop skills they like. For example, if they want to be a chef in the future, the school must show them what they want to do.

In other words, you don't necessarily have to be successful academically to have a career. However, if the curriculum supports the relevant knowledge, it will accelerate your career as a chef. In summary, students should prepare well for exams during class, but they should focus on the skills they need for their future plans.

Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking - mẫu 5

It is irrefutable that nowadays, education is becoming necessary for children. While some believe that learners ought to learn the educational syllabus to attain clearance in exams rather than other activities such as cooking, others reject this notion. However, I completely disagree with the former statement. This essay will analyze my views by taking examples to demonstrate my views and prove my arguments.

There is no doubt that science and mathematics subjects should be given more importance in academic studies due to the fact that tutees can learn about logic and understand the world around them. However, not all scholars will become scientists in the future, but cooking food is necessary for all of them at every stage of their life. For example, after studies, some students move abroad if they do not have cooking skills they will face senior difficulties in their life. As a result, if they learn these skills in university, the worst situation can be avoided.

Cooking is a survival skill, and these activities help students learn more about nutritional facts and how to remain fit. What they really do is, learn how to prepare healthy and nutritious food for themselves under proper teacher’s supervision so that they can easily prepare distinct dishes easily without any trouble. For instance, a student who knows cooking has a low risk of diseases as they avoid junk food than individuals who do not know cooking. In addition, by gaining cooking skills, students become not only good cooks but also more innovative.

In conclusion, although the academic curriculum is beneficial, cooking is a survival skill and a protective factor against health issues. I believe that the academy should take the responsibility to educate children on some practical activities.

Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking - mẫu 6

Some believe that education is primarily taught subjects for passing academic exams. In addition, practical skill is not important to teach students. I completely disagree with this statement.

Education is the biggest part of everyone’s life. First and foremost, education is not only learning academic books and also learning practical skills. To elaborate, practical skill is one of the important skills in our daily life. Moreover, every student wants to know about practical skills such as cooking, cleaning, washing and folding. Learning academic subjects and physical activities both are equal in our life. Apart from that, communication skill is one of the important skills. A person is educated in academic subjects, but he/ she does not know how to communicate in a good way. It seems they failed in their achievement.

Secondly, there are a lot of well-known persons reached their goals become of their soft skills. Not only do they score very well in their academic subjects. For example, our retired president APJ Abdul Kalam is famous not because he is the president of India but also his character. His character took up his position, and his practical knowledge took up his goal. Furthermore, every human wants to know how to become a good person. It not only happens through academic education. I also want to know more about general and practical skills.

In conclusion, in my opinion, education is not only to achieve a good score in academic subjects it also to educate more about other skills.

Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking - mẫu 7

The issue of deciding what should go on academic curricula has been hotly debated, with some arguing that time would be better spent preparing for the exams with no time wasted on other skills such as cooking or dressing. Personally, I believe that the purpose of education is to develop children’s potential, and this would mean teaching them not only academic subjects but also life skills.

Firstly, the idea that schooling exists only to get young minds through a series of standardized exams can result in a generation of students that know nothing more than studying and who are unable to develop their potential. Education is meant to be a tool to empower and uplift children, to prepare them for the world and to ensure they thrive within it; to twist it into a mere scheme for achieving high scores on exams is to miss the point entirely and could result in them not being able to discover hidden talents. Children who are taught to cook at an early age, for example, might find that it is their specialty - as they grow up, they might rather be a chef than an average worker.

Secondly, whilst some will argue that this job should be delegated to the parents, relying on them to teach essential life skills is a flawed idea as they are not likely to have both the experience and the opportunity to teach such skills. Most low-income families hold down two or three jobs at once, and are unable to make the time to teach such skills; students should therefore be taught basic housework skills in order to take care of themselves and support their parents. By saving time cooking, for instance, mothers can instead focus on answering emails, allowing them to supplement family income and better support their child in other ways.

In conclusion, I believe that only teaching students about academic knowledge means missing out on potential talent and results in more responsibility on parents; as such, I argue that other skills should be taught as well.

Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking - mẫu 8

In recent decades, the content of school curriculum has never failed to draw public attention and provoked debates. It is maintained that schools should provide students with academic knowledge and disregard the coverage of soft skills like cooking or dressing. From my own perspective, this opinion is only partly justifiable because both are indispensable in improving the well-being of students.

On the one hand, academic knowledge is undeniably of tremendous importance in the modern world. In fact, communities are more inclined to judge people based on their academic background. Students graduating from top-tier universities are usually granted more decent and stable jobs. For this reason, schools should prioritize academic knowledge so as to prepare students for important exams such as high school graduation or university entrance tests. By doing this, there is a better possibility that students can be admitted to prestigious tertiary educational institutions in the pursuit of their career path.

On the other hand, it is unrealistic to abandon the education of survival skills. The lack of survival skills will present students with obstacles in life when they grow up. However, not every student is adequately exposed to such daily tasks as cooking, cleaning, dressing at home. This is because some parents pamper students or force them to solely focus on schoolworks. Therefore, the incorporation of survival skills in school curriculum will be vital for students when they lead an independent life.

All in all, both academic knowledge and daily skills are essential in educating the young generation. To my mind, schools should strike a balance and include both of these aspects in their curriculum.

Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking - mẫu 9

Many educators today feel pressure to teach to the test and emphasise academic subjects over more practical ones. In my opinion, this approach is overtly short-sighted and practical skills play an important role in a well-rounded education.

Those who support a singular focus on academics can point to its tangible outcome in higher test scores. A good example of this would be accelerating academic progress at inner city schools. There have been numerous reforms in the last several decades to help the poorest performing districts catch up. The results have been uneven at times but overall, more students from impoverished or troubled backgrounds can now go to college, often being the first person in their family to do so. Passing exams has the very real benefit of giving them opportunities outside of menial work and, in the most extreme cases, crime.

Though there might be a case for overemphasis on academics in select districts, learning practical skills is an important part of becoming an all-around person. Those who possess certain skills, such as a sharp memory and logical thinking, will perform better in academics like math and physics. This means that these skills are rewarded and may become over-developed at the expense of skills related to practical work such as spatial thinking and multi-tasking. Graduates who know how to please their teachers and get good grades in academic subjects will find themselves lacking in real world skills. Adding practical skills goes a long way towards making this a reality.

In conclusion, the argument for academics only applies to niche segments of society and learning practical skills has tremendous benefits. Schools should find ways to balance both despite external pressure from the government and parents for the reductive measure of higher marks.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in groups, while others believe that it is better for them to study alone. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

• Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students. Do you think its advantages will outweigh the disadvantages?

• Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

• Some people think that outdoor activities are more beneficial for children’s development than playing computer games. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• In many workplaces, online communication is now more common than face-to-face meetings. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?

---