Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that government

Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that government should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Đề bài: Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that government should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that government - mẫu 1

Opinions are divided on whether higher education should be made free of charge for all individuals, eliminating financial barriers, as many consider it a universal right. Although this proposition could yield certain benefits, I believe its associated disadvantages far outshine them.

Admittedly, free university access, in theory, could be beneficial to both personal finances and a nation’s workforce. Regarding the former, university tuition fees are increasingly unaffordable in most countries, and thus add to the financial burden that students and families must bear. Subsidizing these expenses would provide additional funds for the populace to address other essential needs, such as food or healthcare, and help alleviate the wealth gap between social groups. Alleviating financial constraints would also enable students from disadvantaged backgrounds to reach their full potential by pursuing majors that best fit their abilities. This scenario could lead to a more educated and productive workforce, fostering more prosperous economies, as seen in Germany and many Scandinavian nations.

However, I believe such a policy may do more harm than good, due to the significant drawbacks it would cause. One of them is that easier access to higher education could diminish its value and also overwhelm educational institutions with applicants. The surge in university students would reduce teaching quality, and graduates could run into challenges finding appropriate employment because of increased competition. All of this eventually wastes a society’s resources in terms of both finances and labour. Moreover, government budgets would be strained by funding this policy. These pressures could result in higher taxes or cuts to other public service sectors, potentially having unforeseen socioeconomic consequences.

In conclusion, while I acknowledge there are certain potential merits to free university education, it could ultimately waste the resources of taxpayers and put pressure on national budgets. As a result, I believe such a policy should not be implemented.

Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that government - mẫu 2

The accessibility of tertiary education among young citizens has consistently been a controversial issue, in which several people argue that providing free university education to all students regardless of their financial background is essential. From a personal perspective, I emphatically disapprove of this assumption owing to its unfeasibility and undesirability. 

To begin with, offering all high-school graduates places in university proves highly impracticable given its unaffordability. In order to distribute free third-level educational services for such a large number of people, the government is entailed to construct more institutions and infrastructure namely classrooms, libraries and lighting. Such a barrage of prohibitive expenses would substantially reduce the national budget, resulting in the deficiency of financial subsidy for other public sectors such as healthcare and transportation. Furthermore, this large-scale provision could instigate a decline in the quality of training in higher education. Indeed, accommodating the demand for third-level education for all students irrespective of their ability may widen their intellectual disparity, thus rendering academic training for all of them more challenging and causing an overall decline in college quality.

In addition, with regard to employment opportunities, providing all school leavers with free access to higher education maybe furtile and ineffective. Due to the increasingly competitive labor market nowadays, the possibility of graduates securing an appropriate occupation is by no means guaranteed. As such, tertiary diplomas and qualifications cannot certify degree holders’ opportunity of being employed after their graduation. Another pitfall of granting numerous all students admission to university lies in an imbalance in the national workforce. As the majority of bachelors are trained to pursue such intellect-based careers as engineering or software programming, this policy could trigger a severe shortfall of manual labor and craftsmanship workers, thereby deterring the whole country’s economic development.

In conclusion, the detrimental impacts this approach could exert on the young’s career prospects and the national economy testify to its ineffectiveness and impracticability. Therefore, I am convinced that decisions as to tertiary education should be made optional based on each individual’ ability and background.

Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that government - mẫu 3

Many today would argue that higher education is a basic right that should extend to all, regardless of socioeconomic background. In my opinion, I largely disagree since there is more value in improving the relationships between social classes.

Supporters of this policy point out that every taxpayer is entitled to equal treatment. Those who are wealthy typically receive little financial support from the government unless they have earned a prestigious scholarship. However, such families pay taxes at far higher rates than the average citizen. They have contributed greatly to the federal budget, and it is only just that they should receive an equal allocation of their share of government disbursement for university. Without financial aid, these individuals may feel they are being unfairly treated simply because they are more successful.

Although I recognize the legitimate merits to the argument above, I would generally side with those who believe a system that takes into account financial differences is more sustainable. If average families are not allocated the majority of funding for higher education, then they may not be able to attend these schools at all. This risk does not exist for the more affluent. Over time, this could have dire ramifications for society. The general populace might feel that upward social mobility is nearly impossible and become demotivated. They may also begin to resent the government and higher classes, creating the conditions for social unrest.

In conclusion, despite calls for fairness under the law, certain distinctions should be made for the betterment of society on the whole. Government policy should be aimed at equality of opportunity rather than a reductive understanding of equality.

Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that government - mẫu 4

Education is a very important part of everyone’s life. Nowadays it is essential for everyone to get a good and high education to become successful in life. Some people think that all people have the right to get a free university education, and their financial background doesn’t matter for their study. In my honest opinion, I agree with this statement to a larger extent, and in some further, in further paragraphs, I will express my opinion with logical facts and points.

First of all, good and quality higher education is the basic need of every person. After completing school, higher education, like university education, played a very significant role in making a successful career. Many people are not able to get this education because of some financial problem, and for that reason, they can’t get high-paid jobs. University education should be made free of costs for everyone by the government so people can easily study without any hesitation and worry about finances while studying. So, they can easily concentrate on their studies and become successful in their life. As an epitome of me, so many Western countries and Arab countries such as Germany, Europe, Dubai, Israel already made university education free for the people of their country; because of that, the earning ratio of people of that country is higher than others.

Moreover, if the person gets higher university education and they get a high paid job, it is good for both the country and the person. For example, the person gets a job in a multinational company, so it increases the economy of the country by spending money in their own country, and it fills up the cost of their free education, which was given by the government as well, and a person can also happily live their life by earning handsome money.

On the other hand, giving free education to everyone is hard for the government. It takes lots of money to make university education free, of course for everyone, and it’s not possible for some poor countries such as Uganda, Zimbabwe. Moreover, if students get free education, then they can’t study in a good manner, and they don’t take education as seriously.

In the end, I would like to conclude by saying that university education plays a major role in one’s life, and government should take the step to make university education free for everyone.

Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that government - mẫu 5

It is thought that studying at university is everyone’s right, and all tuition fees should be fully paid by the government. The former view is reasonable; however, I disagree that the government should take responsibility for students’ university education fees.

I believe every student is entitled to go to college to acquire tertiary degrees. It is because, from my point of view, knowledge gained at university should be freely imparted to everyone. Furthermore, all students, although different in financial backgrounds, are equal in intelligence and scholastic capability, hence equal opportunities to gain admittance to university.

However, the government is under no obligation to take care of university attenders’ education costs. Providing free tertiary education might either push the government to the verge of bankruptcy or levy higher taxes on citizens because the costs for the government to maintain facilities or employ qualified teachers are certainly exorbitant. Additionally, education quality would also suffer owing to the increased number of students in one class, which prevents teachers from giving out thorough care for everyone. In fact, class size also exerts a fairly significant impact on how each student interacts with teachers and their peers. If there are too many members in one class, they will be afraid to ask questions, for example, which leads to their poor performance at university.

In conclusion, while I agree that it is everyone’s right to pursue tertiary education, it seems to me that the government should not fully pay for study costs. So far, there have been ample opportunities for scholarships or exemptions; and I think that is the best method to support students.

Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that government - mẫu 6

The right to access university education is a contentious issue, with some believing that the government should make it free for all students. Despite the supporting argument, I am inclined to disagree with this opinion, as this course of action has negative implications.

It is understandable that some people support free university education. The primary reason is that students would be provided with equal opportunities, with those from lower-income households being less disadvantaged in particular. Students who are normally burdened by tuition fees would be relieved of their predicament, allowing them to fully devote themselves to the pursuit of knowledge. Furthermore, such a policy can be the precursor to a highly educated population. Thanks to universalized tertiary education, more people can become academic experts, enhancing the level of discourse in society. It would, therefore, seem that making university education free of charge is a worthwhile goal.

This policy, however, is far from ideal. There would be a new financial burden on the public, since universities require additional funding to teach expanding student cohorts that inevitably result. Taxpayers would be disaffected if their hard-earned money is used to support groups of people whose material contribution to society is deemed nebulous. Another point less talked about is the reduced academic freedom in higher education. Universities which submit to this government policy to receive funding would be significantly influenced by what the bureaucrats decide they could teach. The consequences of this are less manifest in the short term, but eventually, a large part of society will have matured thinking the same way, reducing the diversity of opinion. Based on these points, it could be argued that tertiary education wholly funded by the public is more disadvantageous than it is beneficial.

In conclusion, I believe university education should not be free for all. As well-meaning as this course of action may sound, it would be an inefficient use of resources and not without pitfalls. There can be other measures to improve the level of knowledge among the populace while still leaving the government unburdened.

Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that government - mẫu 7

The issue of access to university education is highly debated, particularly regarding whether the government should provide it free of charge to all students. Despite arguments in favor, I disagree with this stance due to its negative consequences.

It is understandable why some advocate for free university education. The main reason is to provide equal opportunities, especially benefiting students from low-income backgrounds. Removing tuition fees would relieve these students of financial burdens, allowing them to fully dedicate themselves to learning. Additionally, such a policy could lead to a more educated population, enhancing societal discourse. Thus, making university education free appears to be a worthwhile objective.

However, this policy is far from ideal. It would place a new financial burden on the public, as universities would require additional funding to accommodate the growing number of students. Taxpayers might resent their money supporting individuals whose contributions to society they perceive as unclear. Another less-discussed concern is the potential impact on academic freedom. Universities agreeing to government funding conditions could face restrictions on what they can teach, ultimately limiting diversity of thought in society. Considering these points, publicly funded tertiary education may be more disadvantageous than beneficial.

In conclusion, I believe that university education should not be universally free. Despite good intentions, this approach would inefficiently allocate resources and present significant challenges.

Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that government - mẫu 8

It is unquestionable that every citizen should have equal opportunities to follow higher education. I believe that the government should allow students to attend university free of charge. However, I disagree with the policy of providing free higher education for all students regardless of their financial background.

Supplying free tertiary education for students is a sensible national investment. Numerous students, if not obliged to pay tuition fees, can afford to cover their living costs; thereby concentrating on academic performance or cultivate their professional skills. Therefore, they may be well qualified for future employment. Additionally, university graduates who have received governmental grants for all university tuition fees can become productive citizens contributing to social betterment. More specifically, after graduation from university, some graduates may become loyal and strong-willed soldiers who could ensure national security and sovereignty or teachers serving to raising people’s intellectual levels and shaping young generations’ behavioral patterns.

However, I oppose the idea of providing tuition fees subsidies for all students irrespective of whether they are rich or poor. Several learners who live in poverty are entitled to free tertiary education although they have no desire to enrich academic knowledge or professional skills. In this case, this policy proves to be a waste of money. Another explanation is that no sooner do national leaders pay all tuition fees for university education than there is high likelihood of a deficiency in state budget for community health services or public transport services which also require a huge amount of fund investment from the government for the benefits of the whole society.

In conclusion, in my view, there are several benefits of free education at university level. However, I disapprove that all students have free higher education opportunities no matter how rich or poor they are.

Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that government - mẫu 9

Education is the basic right of every human being. Education creates empowerment and makes the people capable of earning their bread and butter. Today we will discuss the importance of education and government policies that shall mandate its access to each human being. As we say that education is priceless, I agree that education up to the university level shall be freely available irrespective of caste, creed and financial status of the family.

To begin with, education is the paramount need of every human being. It evolves the person and provides knowledge to synchronize with changing world and lifestyle. The percentage of educated people in a country decides its global position in the list of powerful nations. Education brings innovation, which eventually drives the growth of the country and attracts foreign investment. Availability of education shall be ensured by the government in all cities and far-flung areas. In fact, it shall be freely accessible by all people up to the university level without any discrimination and limitation.

Further to add above, education enables a person to know their rights, which makes them smart enough to get fooled, especially in the modern era, where the world is rapidly changing, and technology has infiltrated so much into people’s personal life. It provides them with enough understanding to make the right selection when required in cases such as voting for government positions. Uneducated people are the prey of politicians and can be fooled easily by them. Uneducated people can be easily divided in the name of caste and religion, which is not good for any country. An educated person understands the motive behind these tactics and stays away from all these tantrums.

To conclude this, I strongly agree that access to education up to the university level shall be provided free to ensure prosperity and development of the nation and society.

Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that government - mẫu 10

A group of people thinks that the government should implement a free tuition policy for everyone to pursue higher education. In my opinion, I completely disagree with the idea that it has to be free for the whole world to acquire university education.

There are some understandable reasons why the tuition fees should not be free. Firstly, if the tuition is free, numerous students will take advantage of it which is unfair to serious ones/ which can lower the overall training standard. It is true/ undeniable/ irrefutable that once people pay for school, they partly show their attempts and money awareness. Hence, students with a serious intention deserve to have the right to acquire tertiary education and gain/ obtain the best job prospects ahead. Also, it is better for those that don’t have much ability and ambition to have other alternatives to learning things they cannot understand. Secondly, free higher/ further education can increase the rate of unemployment due to the great number of so-called well-educated people which makes the labour market more competitive. For example, because of the enormous surplus of fresh graduates on a yearly basis, there is a dramatic decline in job opportunities in Vietnam.

On the other hand, the university is already free to some extent. In most schools around the world, they always offer brilliant students full or half-fee scholarships. In addition, there are many organizations nowadays offering potential students scholarships as well as internship and job opportunities. By these ways can government not only motivate their students, but they also help maintain the capital sources to function higher tertiary

In conclusion, despite the great importance of tertiary education, I believe that free tuition policy applied to all students in the university should not be carried out.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• In many countries, more and more people choose to buy imported food rather than food produced locally. Why do people buy imported food? What could be done to encourage people to buy local food?

• Many scientists believe that now we can study the behavior of a three-year-old child to see whether they will grow up to be criminals. To what extent do you think crime is determined by human nature? Is it possible to stop children from growing up to be criminals?

• Some people think that young people can learn useful skills by playing electronic and computer games. Others argue that people who play electronic and computer games are wasting their time. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

• The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is by providing free public transport 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that the divers should cover the costs. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

---